Linking AM-PAC Cognition to PROMIS Cognitive Function.

Linking AM-PAC Cognition to PROMIS Cognitive Function.
复制标题

将AM-PAC认知与PROMIS认知功能联系起来。

DOI:
10.1016/j.apmr.2021.04.012
复制
发表时间:
2021-11
影响因子:
4.3
通讯作者:
Hanmer J
Hanmer J
中科院分区:
医学1区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Thackeray A;Marcus RL;Yu L;McCracken P;Cardell B;Hanmer J

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

将急性期后护理的活动测量(AM-PAC)应用认知与患者报告结局测量信息系统(PROMIS)认知功能相关联,从而实现跨量表的通用指标。横断面调查研究。门诊康复诊所。500名年龄≥18岁的参与者(N=500)的对比性样本,接受门诊治疗(身体、职业、言语)。不适用因AM-PAC Medicare和通用认知简表和PROMIS认知功能项目代表PROMIS认知功能项目库。使用项目反应理论对25个AM-PAC认知项目与11个固定PROMIS认知功能项目参数进行校准,表明项目测量相同的基本结构(认知)。这两个量表都测量了广泛的功能。AM-PAC通用认知评估显示,认知水平较低的可靠性更高,而PROMIS认知功能完整项目库在更大的分数分布中更可靠。数据适用于固定锚项目反应理论为基础的人行横道和AM-PAC认知原始分数映射到PROMIS指标。在这项研究中开发的人行横道允许转换分数从AM-PAC应用认知的PROMIS认知功能量表。
To link the Activity Measure for Post-Acute Care (AM-PAC) Applied Cognition to the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Cognitive Function, allowing for a common metric across scales. Cross-sectional survey study. Outpatient rehabilitation clinics. Consecutive sample of 500 participants (N=500) aged ≥18 years presenting for outpatient therapy (physical, occupation, speech). Not applicable. AM-PAC Medicare and Generic Cognition short forms and PROMIS Cognitive Function items representing the PROMIS Cognitive Function item bank. The calibration of 25 AM-PAC cognition items with 11 fixed PROMIS cognitive function item parameters using item-response theory indicated that items were measuring the same underlying construct (cognition). Both scales measured a wide range of functioning. The AM-PAC Generic Cognitive assessment showed more reliability with lower levels of cognition, whereas the PROMIS Cognitive Function full-item bank was more reliable across a larger distribution of scores. Data were appropriate for a fixed-anchor item response theory-based crosswalk and AM-PAC Cognition raw scores were mapped onto the PROMIS metric. The crosswalk developed in this study allows for converting scores from the AM-PAC Applied Cognition to the PROMIS Cognitive Function scale.
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-019-02312-8
发表时间: 2020-01-01
影响因子: 3.5
作者:
Segawa, Eisuke;Schalet, Benjamin;Cella, David
通讯作者: Cella, David
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2014.12.043
发表时间: 2015-03-01
影响因子: 11.3
作者:
Saffer, Boaz Y.;Lanting, Shawnda C.;Iverson, Grant L.
通讯作者: Iverson, Grant L.
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.04.020
发表时间: 2006-08-01
影响因子: 4.3
作者:
Haley, Stephen M.;Siebens, Hilary;Ni, Pengsheng
通讯作者: Ni, Pengsheng
DOI: 10.1097/bot.0000000000000059
发表时间: 2014-08-01
影响因子: 2.3
作者:
Hung, Man;Stuart, Ami R.;Kubiak, Erik N.
通讯作者: Kubiak, Erik N.
DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.2152
发表时间: 2015-09-01
影响因子: 39
作者:
Tsoi, Kelvin K. F.;Chan, Joyce Y. C.;Kwok, Timothy C. Y.
通讯作者: Kwok, Timothy C. Y.