Flight handling qualities

Flight handling qualities
复制标题

飞行操纵品质

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2006
影响因子:
1.4
通讯作者:
G. Padfield
G. Padfield
中科院分区:
工程技术4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
G. Padfield

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

摘要 本文介绍了利物浦大学航空航天工程工程硕士 (MEng) 四年级本科生基于问题的学习核心模块和系统工程理学硕士课程的可选模块“飞行处理质量”(FHQ) 前三年交付的方法和主要成果。该模块的目的是为学生提供解决飞机操纵质量(HQ)和相关“整机”问题所需的技能和知识。通过一系列互动讲座,向学生介绍处理质量工程的理论。学生们以四人或五人为一组进行工作,并在整个第一学期进行大量的团队建设练习。团队的想法是,飞机及其操控品质是知识获取和技能发展的重点。每个团队的任务是评估和量化特定角色的特定飞机的总部,然后针对他们发现的任何操作缺陷进行修复;目前的飞机包括 Wright Flyer、Grob 115、Black Hawk、Bo-105 和 XV-15。团队在第一个学期结束时撰写中期报告,在第二个学期结束时撰写最终报告,展示他们如何评估飞机、制定问题解决方案并就飞机在既定角色中的适用性提出建议。报告还讨论了拟议升级的技术可行性和经济可行性。这些团队向“客户”(一组工作人员、另一个学生团队、来访的实业家)展示他们的作品,目的是证明飞机现在适合这个角色。每个学生都会保留一份“个人学习日记”,在其中记录他们对操控品质以及更一般的可转移技能的理解的发展。该模块旨在使学生能够参与构思-设计-实施-操作 (CDIO) 周期的所有要素。
Abstract This paper describes the methodology and key results from the first three years of delivery of ‘Flight Handling Qualities’ (FHQ), a problem-based-learning core module for fourth year Master of Engineering (MEng) undergraduates in Aerospace Engineering and optional module for the Systems Engineering MSc Programme, at the University of Liverpool. The module aim is to equip students with the skills and knowledge required to tackle aircraft handling qualities (HQs) and related ‘whole aircraft’ problems. Students are presented with the theory of handling qualities engineering in a series of interactive lectures. The students work in teams of four or five and undertake a number of team-building exercises throughout the first semester. Teams are presented with the idea that the aircraft with its handling qualities is the focus for knowledge acquisition and skills development. Each team is given the task of assessing and quantifying the HQs of a particular aircraft in a particular role, and then developing fixes to any handling deficiencies they identify; the current aircraft include the Wright Flyer, Grob 115, Black Hawk, Bo-105 and XV-15. Teams write an interim report at the end of the first term and a final report at the end of the second term, showing how they have assessed the aircraft, developed solutions to the problems and made recommendations concerning the aircraft’s suitability in the defined role. The reports also address the technical feasibility and economic viability of the proposed upgrades. The teams present their work to mock ‘customers’ (group of staff, another student team, visiting Industrialists) with the objective of demonstrating that the aircraft is now fit for the role. Each individual student maintains a ‘personal learning journal’, in which they document the development of their understanding of handling qualities and, more general, transferable skills. The module is designed to enable students to engage in all elements of the conceive-design-implement-operate (CDIO) cycle.