Comparison of Grid-2-Grid and TRIP runoff routing schemes
Comparison of Grid-2-Grid and TRIP runoff routing schemes
复制标题
Grid-2-Grid 和 TRIP 径流路由方案的比较
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2010
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
V. Bell
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
S. Dadson;V. Bell
本报告的目的是比较用于全球和区域气候模型的两种河流流量演算方案 TRIP 和 G2G。 TRIP 是 [Oki et al., 1999] 开发的总径流积分路径方案； G2G 是由 [Bell et al., 2007] 设计的网格到网格路由方案。在本报告中，使用来自 JULES 的地表和地下径流数据以及 GSWP-2 数据强制对两种路线方案进行了离线测试。每个路线模型的性能均根据全球十个最大河流流域的观测数据（如有）进行评估。当强制时，模型输出也与 HadGEM3 生成的径流数据进行比较。
The purpose of this report is to compare two river flow routing schemes, TRIP and G2G, for use in global and regional climate models. TRIP is the Total Runoff Integrating Pathways scheme developed by [Oki et al., 1999]; G2G is the Grid-to-Grid routing scheme designed by [Bell et al., 2007]. In this report, the two routing schemes are tested offline using surface and sub-surface runoff data from JULES forced with GSWP-2 data. The performance of each routing model is evaluated against observed data, where available, for ten of the largest river catchments globally. The model outputs are also compared when forced with runoff data produced by HadGEM3.