The good, the bad and the central of group identification: Evidence of a U‐shaped quadratic relation between in‐group affect and identity centrality

The good, the bad and the central of group identification: Evidence of a U‐shaped quadratic relation between in‐group affect and identity centrality
复制标题

群体认同的好、坏和中心:群体内情感和身份中心性之间 U 形二次关系的证据

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2016
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
J. Crush
J. Crush
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Frank J. Kachanoff;Renate Ysseldyk;Donald M. Taylor;R. Sablonnière;J. Crush

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

本研究调查了社会群体认同的两个广泛研究的维度——群体内情感和中心性之间的相互关系。具体来说,我们测试了群体内情感和身份中心性之间二次曲线关系的有效性。我们认为,相对于具有中性情感的群体成员,那些对其群体感到明显积极影响或明显消极影响的群体成员更有可能认为他们的身份是其自我概念的核心组成部分。我们发现群体内情感与身份中心性之间存在二次关系的证据,涉及人们的文化身份(N = 512)、种族身份(N = 462)、宗教身份(N = 61、N = 384)和种族身份(N = 3600、N = 2400)。讨论了群体认同的测量和概念化的理论和实践意义。版权所有 © 2016 约翰·威利父子有限公司
The present research investigates the interrelation between two widely studied dimensions of social group identity—in-group affect and centrality. Specifically, we test the validity of a quadratic curvilinear relation between in-group affect and identity centrality. We propose that group members who feel either decidedly positive affect or decidedly negative affect towards their group are more likely to feel that their identity is a central component of their self-concept relative to group members with neutral affect. We find evidence for a quadratic relation between in-group affect and identity centrality with respect to people's cultural identity (N = 512), ethnic identity (N = 462), religious identity (N = 61, N = 384) and racial identity (N = 3600, N = 2400). Theoretical and practical implications for the measurement and conceptualization of group identification are discussed. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.2008.00379.x
发表时间: 2009-01-01
影响因子: 7.2
作者:
Haslam, S. Alexander;Jetten, Jolanda;Haslam, Catherine
通讯作者: Haslam, Catherine