Qualitative analysis: how to begin making sense.
Qualitative analysis: how to begin making sense.
复制标题
定性分析：如何开始有意义。
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
1994
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
B. Crabtree
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
W. Miller;B. Crabtree
用于理解患者关注的临床过程与定性研究的分析过程密切相似。这部分解释了为什么定性研究方法适用于许多家庭实践研究问题。不幸的是，定性研究人员使用的语言，特别是在分析方面，往往是模糊的。这阻碍了家庭医生进行定性研究。本文概述了定性分析，并介绍了一种语言和手段，家庭医生可以开始，使定性数据的意义。定义了“自反性”、“迭代”、“数据饱和”和“文本”等概念。定性分析的三个核心步骤被确定，并与诊断过程进行比较。它们包括选择一个组织系统，减少数据和建立连接。四个理想化的方式进行这些步骤，编辑，模板，quasistatistical，沉浸/结晶，并比较接近病人的关注的四种方式。最后，描述了为一个假设的研究性学习创建一个适当的定性分析策略的过程，并回顾了定性分析的一些陷阱和原则。
The clinical process used to make sense of patient concerns closely parallels the analysis process of qualitative research. This partly explains why qualitative research methods are appropriate for many family practice research questions. Unfortunately, the language used by qualitative researchers, especially with regards to analysis, is often obscure. This impedes family physicians from implementing qualitative research. This paper overviews qualitative analysis and introduces a language and means by which family physicians can begin to make sense of qualitative data. The concepts, "reflexivity," "iteration," "data saturation," and "text," are defined. Three core steps of qualitative analysis are identified and compared to the diagnostic process. They consist of choosing an organizing system, reducing the data, and making connections. Four idealized ways for conducting these steps, editing, template, quasistatistical, and immersion/crystallization, are presented and compared to four ways of approaching patient concerns. Finally, the process of creating an appropriate qualitative analysis strategy is described for a hypothetical research study and some pitfalls and principles of qualitative analysis are reviewed.