Tetramolecular Fluorescence Complementation for Detection of Specific RNAs in Vitro
Tetramolecular Fluorescence Complementation for Detection of Specific RNAs in Vitro
复制标题
DOI:
10.1002/cbic.201200734
复制
发表时间:
2013-01-21
期刊:
影响因子:
3.2
通讯作者:
Rentmeister, Andrea
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Kellermann, Stefanie Julia;Rath, Anna Katharina;Rentmeister, Andrea
Asymmetrically localized RNA has been found in many cell types and organisms and contributes to important developmental processes, such as mating type switching in yeast,[1] body axis formation in Drosophila,[2] and directional steering in axons in the mammalian brain.[3] Different mechanisms, including localized transcription, directed degradation, diffusion and anchoring, or active transport, can lead to this asymmetric localization.[4] To better understand the processes leading to asymmetric localization, probes capable of RNA imaging in the complex cellular environment are required. Importantly, these probes should yield a different signal between their bound and unbound forms, or the signal should be substantially enhanced upon binding to the target RNA. Several strategies to discriminate between bound and unbound probe have been developed to date. In the most straightforward approach, the fluorescence is increased locally by attaching multiple fluorophores to the RNA. This strategy has been used successfully in living cells, but the RNA of interest had to be extended by up to hundreds of nucleotides.[1, 5] This appendage might impair binding or trafficking behavior of the original RNA. In another approach, the FRET effect has been harnessed to provide a distinct signal when two nucleic acid based probes labeled with suitable chromophores are bound adjacent to each other.[6] Molecular beacons (stem–loop structures modified by a fluorophore and a quencher at the 5оand 3о-ends that light up upon binding to target RNA) and forced intercalation probes (peptide nucleic acid based probes in which an intercalator dye serves as a base surrogate) represent other widely used approaches.[7] Labeled nucleic acids, however, cannot be produced inside cells, and delivery of nucleic acid-based probes into cells remains a challenge.[7b] Therefore, the sequence specificity and light-up properties realized in molecular beacons combined with the possibility to genetically encode fluorescence represents a valuable alternative. To this end, RNA binding proteins that recognize specific RNA sequences or structures have been fused to split fluorescent reporter proteins. Several proteins, such as fragileX mental retardation protein, the eukaryotic initiation factor 4A, and Pumilio, have been successfully implemented for RNA detection.[8, 11] Pumilio is an RNA binding protein that binds to a stretch of eight nucleotides of single-stranded RNA (ssRNA) in a sequence-specific manner.[9] Crystal structure analysis has revealed the molecular details of the RNA–protein interaction.[9] Therefore, it has become possible to rationally design Pumilio variants with altered specificity.[10] The combination of Pumilio proteins with split green fluorescent protein (GFP) variants was realized by Ozawa [11] and Tilsner [12] and applied to HeLa and epidermis cells. By bridging two RNA binding proteins fused to split-GFP, a trimolecular fluorescence complementation system was established.[8a] Fluorescence complementation of GFP or Venus has been successfully used to probe protein–protein interactions (bimolecular fluorescence complementation) and, to a lesser extent, RNA–protein interactions (trimolecular fluorescence complementation),[11–13] but still suffers from some limitations. Firstly, self-assembly of the two parts of the fluorescent protein has been reported, and this causes significant background signal.[14] This is particularly aggravating because it increases the background fluorescence and thus compromises discrimination between bound and unbound probe. Mutations that reduce this background improved the signal-to-noise ratio.[14] Secondly, split-GFP …