The Complexities of Power in Feminist Multicultural Psychotherapy Supervision
The Complexities of Power in Feminist Multicultural Psychotherapy Supervision
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/cou0000179
复制
发表时间：
2017-03-01
影响因子：
3.9
通讯作者：
Morrow, Susan L.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Arczynski, Alexis V.;Morrow, Susan L.
本研究的目的是了解目前的女性主义多元文化管理者如何理解和实施其女性主义多元文化原则到临床监督。我们通过回答以下研究问题来解决这一目标：自我认同的女性主义多元文化心理治疗监督者如何概念化和实践女性主义监督，这是明确的多元文化？14名参与者的观点，通过半结构化的初始访谈，后续访谈和反馈访谈，并通过女性主义建构主义扎根理论的设计和分析进行了调查。大多数参与者确定为咨询心理学家（n = 12），女性（n = 11）和暂时健全（n = 11），但他们确定不同的种族/民族，性，精神/宗教，世代和国籍的状态。一个7类的实证框架出现，解释了参与者如何预期和管理监督权力。核心范畴，监督中权力的复杂性，解释了参与者如何概念化监督关系中的权力。剩下的6个类别是将历史带入监督室，通过开放和诚实创造信任，使用协作过程，满足不断变化的发展对称性，培养批判性自反性，以及查看和平衡上下文的影响。研究的局限性，研究的意义，并建议使用的理论框架，以改变监管实践和培训进行了讨论。
The goal of the present study was to understand how current feminist multicultural supervisors understand and implement their feminist multicultural principles into clinical supervision. We addressed this aim by answering the following research question: How do self-identified feminist multicultural psychotherapy supervisors conceptualize and practice feminist supervision that is explicitly multicultural? The perspectives of 14 participant supervisors were obtained by using semistructured initial interviews, follow-up interviews, and feedback interviews and were investigated via a feminist constructivist grounded theory design and analysis. Most participants identified as counseling psychologists (n = 12), women (n = 11) and temporarily able-bodied (n = 11); but they identified with diverse racial/ethnic, sexual, spiritual/religious, generational, and nationality statuses. A 7-category empirical framework emerged that explained how the participants anticipated and managed power in supervision. The core category, the complexities of power in supervision, explained how participants conceptualized power in supervisory relationships. The 6 remaining categories were bringing history into the supervision room, creating trust through openness and honesty, using a collaborative process, meeting shifting developmental (a) symmetries, cultivating critical reflexivity, and looking at and counterbalancing the impact of context. Limitations of the study, implications for research, and suggestions to use the theoretical framework to transform supervisory practice and training are discussed.