Effectiveness of a social influence approach and boosters to smoking prevention
Effectiveness of a social influence approach and boosters to smoking prevention
复制标题
DOI：
10.1093/her/14.6.791
复制
发表时间：
1999-12-01
影响因子：
2.4
通讯作者：
Parcel, GS
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Dijkstra, M;Mesters, I;Parcel, GS
本文介绍了一项随机吸烟预防试验的短期和长期结果。目的是评估两个吸烟预防计划，一个是社会影响 (SI) 计划，另一个是带有附加决策成分的 SI 计划 (SIDM)。此外，还评估了助推器的贡献，将 52 所学校随机分配到 SI 计划、SIDM 计划或对照组。一半的治疗学校被随机分配到加强条件组；另一半则没有接受助推器。这两个项目均由五节课组成，每节课持续 45 分钟，每周在荷兰高中 8 年级和 9 年级进行。最成功的计划是带有增强剂的 SI 计划，在 12 个月和 18 个月的随访中，与对照组（分别为 12.6 % 和 14.9%）相比，吸烟率的增幅（分别为 5.6 % 和 9.7%）显着降低。结果表明，加强剂可以成为维持或提高吸烟预防计划有效性的有效工具。建议在国家一级实施带有加强剂的 SI 计划，因为这种干预措施显示出最大的行为效果。
This paper presents the short-term and longterm results of a randomized smoking prevention trial. The purpose was to evaluate two smoking prevention programs, a social influence (SI) program and a SI program with an additional decision-making component (SIDM). Moreover, the contribution of boosters was assessed as well, Fifty-two schools were randomly assigned to the SI program, the SIDM program or a control group. Half of the treatment schools were randomly assigned to the booster condition; the other half did not receive boosters. Both programs consisted of five lessons, each lasting 45 min, and were given in weekly sessions in grades 8 and 9 of high schools in the Netherlands. The most successful program was the SI program with boosters which resulted in a significantly lower increase in smoking rates (5.6 and 9.7%, respectively) compared to the control group (12.6 and 14.9%, respectively) at both 12 and 18 months followup. The results suggest that boosters can be an effective tool for maintaining or increasing the effectiveness of smoking prevention programs, It is recommended that the SI program with the booster be implemented at the national level, since this intervention showed the greatest behavioral effects.