Equivalence of some definitions of recursion in a higher type object1

Equivalence of some definitions of recursion in a higher type object1
复制标题

DOI:
10.2307/2272241
复制
发表时间:
--
期刊:
JOURNAL OF SYMBOLIC LOGIC
影响因子:
0.57
通讯作者:
F. Lowenthal
F. Lowenthal
中科院分区:
3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
F. Lowenthal

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

In [4] Kleene gave a definition of recursive functionals of finite type. Later Sacks [5] and Harrington [2] gave definitions of recursion in normal functionals of finite type. These definitions, that Sacks and Harrington assumed equivalent as far as normal objects are concerned, are nevertheless very different: Kleene's definition is given in terms of an inductive definition; Sacks uses simultaneously a hierarchy (the S σ F's) and induction on the ordinals and on the type; Harrington's universe does not use the induction on the type but uses a hierarchy as Shoenfield [6]. In this paper we prove in detail that, as was expected, the three definitions are equivalent.