Similar attentional, frequency, and associative effects for pseudohomophones and words.
Similar attentional, frequency, and associative effects for pseudohomophones and words.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037//0096-1523.19.1.166
复制
发表时间：
1993-02
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
G. Lukatela;Michael T. Turvey
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
G. Lukatela;Michael T. Turvey
在呈现和回忆1或5个数字之间，SS完成了第二项任务，即命名视觉呈现的字母串--一个伪同音字(例如，Fole，Hoap)或其对应的真实单词(Foal，Hope)。记忆负荷与频率(HOPE与FOAL、HOAP与FOE)相互作用，但与词汇性(HOPE与HOAP、FOAL与FOE)无关。这一结果与以下模型相反，在这些模型中，非单词由组合音系学的缓慢(资源昂贵)过程命名，而单词由访问词汇音系学的快速(资源廉价)过程命名。当命名的联想启动任务次于记忆任务时，伪同音位联想启动(Hoap-绝望、Fole-Horse)等同于联想启动(希望-绝望、马驹)，并且同样受到记忆负荷的影响。组合音系学似乎是单词和非单词命名的基础。
Between the presentation and recall of 1 or 5 digits, Ss performed a secondary task of naming a visually presented letter string--a pseudohomophone (e.g., FOLE, HOAP) or its real-word counterpart (FOAL, HOPE). Memory load interacted with frequency (HOPE vs. FOAL, HOAP vs. FOLE) but not with lexicality (HOPE vs. HOAP, FOAL vs. FOLE). This outcome counters models in which nonwords are named by a slow (resource-expensive) process that assembles phonology and words are named by a fast (resource-inexpensive) process that accesses lexical phonology. When the associative priming-of-naming task was secondary to the memory task, pseudohomophone associative priming (HOAP-DESPAIR, FOLE-HORSE) equaled associative priming (HOPE-DESPAIR, FOAL-HORSE) and was affected in the same way by memory load. Assembled phonology seems to underlie the naming of both words and nonwords.