Introduction to AVO and this special issue

Introduction to AVO and this special issue
复制标题

AVO 和本期特刊简介

DOI:
10.1190/1.1487167
复制
发表时间:
1993
期刊:
影响因子:
3.3
通讯作者:
B. Russell
B. Russell
中科院分区:
地球科学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
B. Russell

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

自从Ostrander重新唤醒了我们对振幅变化与炮检距分析(AVO)的兴趣以来,人们对这一课题产生了极大的兴趣,也产生了一定的争议。一方面,有许多地球物理学家认为AVO是地球物理行业有史以来发生的最伟大的事情,他们拒绝做任何不包括这项技术的勘探工作。另一方面,还有另一群地球物理学家声称,AVO方法被过度推销,以至于损害了该行业(参见Norman Neidell所著的地球物理可信度--专业生存的关键,1992年12月TLE)。我自己的观点是,真相就在这两个极端之间。然而,冒着惹恼那些声称我们过度推销AVO方法的人的风险,TLE编辑委员会决定将这一期特刊放在一起。我们的决定既反映了洛杉矶...
Since the reawakening of our interest in amplitude variation with offset analysis (AVO) by Ostrander (in Plane‐wave reflection coeficients for gas and sands at non‐normal incidence, Geophysics 1984), there has been phenomenal interest in the subject, and also a certain amount of controversy. On the one hand, there are many geophysicists who feel that AVO is the greatest thing to ever happen to the geophysical industry and who refuse to do any exploration work without including this technique. On the other hand, there is a second group of geophysicists who claim that the AVO method has been so strongly oversold that it has hurt the industry (see Geophysical credibility‐A key to professional survival by Norman Neidell, December 1992 TLE). My own opinion is that the truth lies somewhere between these two polar extremities. However, at the risk of upsetting those who claim we have oversold the AVO method, the TLE Editorial Board has decided to put together this special issue. Our decision reflects both the la...