Fluency in reading—Thirty-five years later
Fluency in reading—Thirty-five years later
复制标题
流利的阅读——三十五年后
作者：
W. Grabe
Paul Nation 的才能和兴趣远远超出了词汇范围，还包括对口语、写作、课堂学习和教学、阅读和流畅性的研究。为了符合国家对流畅性、广泛阅读和阅读教学的兴趣，我概述了当前对阅读流畅性及其作为阅读理解能力关键组成部分的作用的看法。本次讨论将包括过去十年中在英语作为第一语言 (L1) 环境中对阅读流畅性、广泛阅读和阅读速度训练的日益重视。尽管许多第二语言 (L2) 从业者可能不太了解英语 L1 语境中流利度研究的显着增长，但它为 L2 阅读研究和教学提供了许多启示（Nation 是极少数走在这一曲线前面的 L2 研究人员之一）。本文还将解释为什么流利度研究通常没有在阅读理解结果方面表现出非凡的进步，指出流利度和阅读理解发展的渐进性质。最后，本文将把 Nation 过去 35 年来一贯倡导的信息与当前对阅读流畅性的看法联系起来。
Paul Nation’s talents and interests extend well beyond vocabulary to include research on speaking, writing, classroom learning and teaching, reading, and fluency. In keeping with Nation’s interests in fluency, extensive reading, and reading instruction, I outline current perspectives on reading fluency and its role as a key component of reading comprehension abilities. This discussion will include the rapidly increasing importance being given to reading fluency, extensive reading, and reading speed training in English as a first language (L1) contexts in the past decade. While this extraordinary growth in fluency research in English L1 contexts might not be well known to many second language (L2) practitioners, it offers many implications for L2 reading research and instruction (and Nation is one of very few L2 researchers to have been out ahead of this curve). The article will also address reasons why fluency research studies often do not demonstrate extraordinary gains in reading comprehension outcomes, pointing to the incremental nature of both fluency and reading comprehension development. Finally, the article will connect messages consistently advocated for by Nation over the past 35 years with current views on reading fluency.
语言学习视角：语言与认知模型
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2007
期刊：
関西大学人間活動理論研究センターCHAT Technical Reports No.6
影响因子：
--
作者：
Kite;Yuriko
通讯作者：
Yuriko