A Systematic Study of the North American Melanthaceæ from the Genetic Standpoint
A Systematic Study of the North American Melanthaceæ from the Genetic Standpoint
复制标题
从遗传学角度对北美Melanthaceae进行系统研究
DOI:
10.1111/j.1095-8339.1918.tb00619.x
复制
发表时间:
1918
影响因子:
2.4
通讯作者:
Frieda Gates
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Frieda Gates
THE purpose of the present paper is a little different lrom that of any previous publication, so far as the writer is aware. It aims to furnish the application to n particular group of plants of n definite point of view regarding the genesis of species. It may he said that every systematist has a point of view in his work, aid tliii is doubtless true, the point of view having been furnished largely by the general Darwinian background, which asstimes the gradual and infinitesimal ditferentiation of species. The point of view of the present work is essentially differ&, in that it asqtimes the variations which differentiate species not to have been universally continuous and infinitesimal, but to have heen defiuite and often discontinuou?. To the writer, one of the most important advances since Darwin has been in the discovery of the dejniteness* of variation. This knowledge is based upon experimental results obtained largely through the work of De Tries, Bateson, Baur, Nilsson-Ehle, and inany others during the last fifteen years. The writer has endeavoured to analyze thir definiteness in the case of tlie Qi! notAera inutstions, and has reached the conclusion j-that inany ditferent though definite types of change: ire iiivolvetl, each giving rise to a different ant1 cliaracteristic mutation. The essential conceptions of variation thus developed though long experience ant1 experiment by the writer with the (Enother: ts are here: ipplied to the specific and generic differentiation of n group o!'Liliales which has not been made the subject of experiment. In short, the method is to apply the mutation conceptions to the systematic treatment of this Liliaceous group in order to determine in how far the inethod is valid and useful. It cannot be expected that final conclusions will be reached in the absence of experimental analysis, and yet I believe the lllethod is sufficiently illnminating to justify its adoption and application to other groups. On tha other hand, it must obviously be used with caution, and in such: i WILY that, speculation does not too far outrun verification by iileans of cytological studies and breeding experiments. If, however, tho