Comparative Study of 27-Gauge Versus 25-Gauge Vitrectomy With Air Tamponade in the Treatment of Myopic Foveoschisis
Comparative Study of 27-Gauge Versus 25-Gauge Vitrectomy With Air Tamponade in the Treatment of Myopic Foveoschisis
复制标题
27 号与 25 号玻璃体切除术加空气填塞治疗近视中央凹劈裂的比较研究
DOI：
10.3928/23258160-20181002-16
复制
发表时间：
2018-10-01
影响因子：
1
通讯作者：
Wei, Yantao
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Jiang, Xintong;Zhang, Shaochong;Wei, Yantao
背景和目的：比较 27 号玻璃体切除术 (PPV) 与 25 号 PPV 的手术结果，并评估空气填塞治疗近视中央凹劈裂 (MF) 的疗效。 患者和方法：连续招募 60 名患者中的 60 只眼睛进行玻璃体切除术、内界膜 (ILM) 剥离和空气填塞 这些眼睛被分为两组：27 号组 (n = 29) 和 25 号组 (n = 31)。 结果：27 号组和 27 号组之间的平均手术时间 (P = .32)、玻璃体切除术平均时间 (P = .20) 和缝合率 (P = .46) 没有显着差异。 25 号组。在最终随访时，两组之间的解剖分辨率没有差异 (P = .65)。 结论：27 号玻璃体切除系统与 25 号系统治疗 MF 一样有效且可行。空气填塞可以提供良好的 MF 术后解剖学分辨率。
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To compare the surgical outcome of 27-gauge pars plane vitrectomy (PPV) with 25-gauge PPV and evaluate the efficacy of air tamponade for the treatment of myopic foveoschisis (MF).PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty eyes of 60 consecutive patients were recruited to undergo vitrectomy, internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling, and air tamponade for treatment of MR These eyes were divided into two groups: the 27-gauge group (n = 29) and the 25-gauge group (n = 31).RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the mean operating time (P = .32), the mean time for vitrectomy (P = .20), and the suturing rate (P = .46) between the 27-gauge group and the 25-gauge group. At the final follow-up, anatomical resolution rate did not differ between the two groups (P = .65).CONCLUSION: The 27-gauge vitrectomy system is as efficient and feasible as the 25-gauge system for the treatment of MF. Air tamponade can provide good postoperative anatomic resolution of MF.