TERMINATION OF ENDOTHELIN SIGNALING - ROLE OF NITRIC-OXIDE
TERMINATION OF ENDOTHELIN SIGNALING - ROLE OF NITRIC-OXIDE
复制标题
DOI:
10.1002/jcp.1041580313
复制
发表时间:
1994-03-01
影响因子:
5.6
通讯作者:
BAHOU, WF
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
GOLIGORSKY, MS;TSUKAHARA, H;BAHOU, WF
Cellular mechanisms responsible for the termination of ET-1 signal are poorly understood. In order to examine the hypothesis that nitric oxide serves as a physiological brake of ET-1 signaling, Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells stably transfected with the ET(A) receptor cDNA (CHO-ET) were studied. CHO-ET responded to ET-1 with robust [Ca2+](i) transients and developed a long-lasting homologous desensitization. Donors of nitric oxide (NO), 3-morpholino-sydnonimine HCl (SIN-I), or sodium nitroprusside (SNP) reduced the amplitude of these responses, accelerated the rate of [Ca2+], recovery, and counteracted the development of homologous desensitization by a cyclic CMP-independent mechanism, suggesting an alternative mode for NO modulation of ET-1 responses. Stimulation of CHO-ET cells with mastoparan, a wasp Venom acting directly on G proteins (bypassing receptor activation), was inhibited by NO, revealing a postreceptoral target for NO-induced modulation of [Ca2+]i mobilization. Using a lys(9)-biotinylated ET-1 (ET-1 [BtK(9)]), binding sites were ''mapped'' in CHO-ET cells. Receptor-ligand complexes did not exhibit spontaneous dissociation during 60-min observations. Quantitative fluorescence microscopy revealed that SNP or SIN-I caused a rapid, concentration-dependent, and reversible dissociation of biotinylated ET-1 from ET(A) receptor (EC(50) = 75 mu M and 6 mu M, respectively), an effect that was not mimicked by 8-bromo-cyclic GMP. ''Sandwich'' co-culture of endothelial cells with CHO-ET showed that activation of NO production by endothelial cells similarly resulted in dissociation of ET-1 [BtK(9)] from ET(A) receptors. We hypothesize that NO plays a role in physiological termination of ET-1 signalling by dual mechanisms: (1) displacement of bound ET-1 from its receptor, thus preventing homologous desensitization, and (2) interference with the postreceptoral pathway for [Ca2+], mobilization, hence inhibiting end-responses to ET-1. (C) 1994 Wiley-Liss, Inc.