The gender turn in diplomacy: a new research agenda
The gender turn in diplomacy: a new research agenda
复制标题
外交中的性别转变：新的研究议程
DOI：
10.1080/14616742.2018.1483206
复制
发表时间：
2018
影响因子：
1.6
通讯作者：
Ann E. Towns
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Karin Aggestam;Ann E. Towns
摘要 本文认为，外交的（重新）构成与性别以及长期以来对女性和男性的排斥和包容的做法密切相关。尽管学术界和实践者之间的大辩论都涉及过去百年外交的变化和连续性，但性别问题却很少受到关注（如果有的话）。因此，本文的首要目标是推进一个新的研究议程，这可以刺激未来的性别研究并有助于重新思考外交。它提出了关于三个不同的外交学术著作的原创叙述，重点关注（1）外交历史； (2) 描述性表述； (3) 性别机构。我们的结论是，首先需要走出欧洲和北美，更多地关注非洲、亚洲和拉丁美洲。其次，有必要超越描述性的单一案例研究，转向更系统的比较，这样可以追踪制度性别动态随时间的变化。民族志工作可以为性别微观过程和日常平凡的制度实践提供新颖的见解。第三，作为外交领域性别转向的一部分，国际女权主义理论可以为外交转型做出重大的理论贡献。
ABSTRACT This article argues that the (re-)constitution of diplomacy is intimately linked to gender and the practices of exclusion and inclusion of women and men over time. While the big debates in both academia and among practitioners concern the change and continuity of diplomacy in the last hundred years, gender has received scant, if any, attention. The overarching aim of this article is therefore to advance a new research agenda, which can spur future gender studies and contribute to rethinking diplomacy. It presents an original narrative about three distinct bodies of diplomatic scholarly work that focus on (1) diplomatic history; (2) descriptive representation; and (3) gendered institutions. We conclude that first there is a need to move out of Europe and North America to provide greater focus on Africa, Asia and Latin America. Second, there is a need to move beyond the descriptive single case studies towards more systematic comparisons, which can trace change in institutional gender dynamics over time. Ethnographic work can provide novel insights to gendered micro-processes and the daily mundane institutional practices. Third, as part of the gender turn in the field of diplomacy international feminist theory can generate significant theoretical contributions to the transformation of diplomacy.
《政治与外交》评论员
DOI：
--
发表时间：
2019
期刊：
影响因子：
--
作者：
瀧口剛（編者）;高橋慶吉;加藤雅俊
通讯作者：
加藤雅俊