Volunteer bias in human sexuality research: Evidence for both sexuality and personality differences in males

Volunteer bias in human sexuality research: Evidence for both sexuality and personality differences in males
复制标题

DOI:
10.1007/bf02437932
复制
发表时间:
1996-04-01
影响因子:
3.8
通讯作者:
Bogaert, AF
Bogaert, AF
中科院分区:
法学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Bogaert, AF

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

个性、社会行为和性行为的差异程度。对两种不同类型的招募(志愿者和非志愿者)下的大学生男性进行了调查。非志愿者(N = 160)表面上被招募用于人格研究,而志愿者(N = 204)被公开招募用于人类性行为研究。两个样本都完成了相同的个性,社会行为和性行为问卷。研究发现,志愿者比非志愿者有更多的性经验,对性的多样性更感兴趣,而且更嗜性。此外,与大多数先前的研究相反,志愿者和非志愿者样本在个性和社会行为方面也存在差异,志愿者在感觉寻求方面高于非志愿者,而在社会整合和遵守规则行为方面低于非志愿者。结果扩展了先前的研究,这表明限制了一些人类性行为研究的普遍性。
The extent to which personality, social behavior, and sexuality differed in. undergraduate males under two different types of recruitment, volunteer and nonvolunteer, was investigated Nonvolunteers (N = 160) were ostensibly recruited for a study on personality, and volunteers (N = 204) were overtly recruited for a study on human sexuality. Both samples completed the same personality, social behavior, and sexuality questionnaires. Volunteers were found to be more sexually experienced, more interested in sexual variety, and more erotophilic than the nonvolunteers. In addition and contrary to most prior research, the volunteer and nonvolunteer samples also differed in personality and social behavior, with the volunteers being higher in sensation seeking and lower on measures of social conformity and rule-following behavior than the nonvolunteers. Results extend prior research suggesting limits to the generalizability of some human sexuality research.