Scurvy in an alcohol-dependent patient with a severely unbalanced diet
Scurvy in an alcohol-dependent patient with a severely unbalanced diet
复制标题
饮食严重不均衡的酒精依赖患者患坏血病
DOI:
10.1111/pcn.12109
复制
发表时间:
2014
影响因子:
11.9
通讯作者:
Tetsuo Shimizu
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Masahiro Takeshima;Masaru Echizenya;Yoshiyuki Inomata;Tetsuo Shimizu
WE HAVE READ with interest the study in which Poletti et al. investigated the affective component of theory of mind (ToM) in patients at early or moderate/advanced stages of Parkinson’s disease (PD), and in a group of healthy subjects (HC). 1 Poletti et al. found impaired affective ToM in PD patients in comparison to HC, while no significant difference between early and moderate patients was found after covarying for all variables significantly different in the PD groups (age, motor disability, general cognitive abilities). 1 Previous studies have produced contrasting findings on impairment of the affective ToM in early PD. Two studies did not report significant differences between PD and HC, 2, 3 whereas Tsuruya et al. found impaired affective ToM. 4 In line with the latter findings, we recently reported dysfunction of both the affective and the cognitive ToM in early PD patients; 5 moreover, altered affective ToM was significantly associated with apathy, a behavioral disturbance associated with dysfunction of non-motor fronto-subcortical circuits in PD. 6 These observations would suggest that a dysfunction of orbitofrontal–limbic circuits may contribute to an impairment of the affective ToM in early PD. There are several methodological differences between the Poletti et al. study and ours: Poletti et al. assessed affective ToM using a non-verbal task mainly based on visual emotion recognition (Reading the Mind in the Eyes Task), 1 whereas we used two verbal tasks (the Emotion Attribution Task, and the Advanced Test of ToM) more specifically tapping the ability to attribute emotions or intentions to others. 5 Moreover, we closely matched early PD patients and HC for demographic and cognitive variables, so that we could directly compare these two groups without relying on the same problematic statistical procedure that Poletti et al. had to adopt. 1