Undertreatment of Gallbladder Cancer: A Nationwide Analysis

Undertreatment of Gallbladder Cancer: A Nationwide Analysis
复制标题

DOI:
10.1245/s10434-021-09607-6
复制
发表时间:
2021-02-10
影响因子:
3.7
通讯作者:
Sachs, Teviah E.
Sachs, Teviah E.
中科院分区:
医学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Papageorge, Marianna, V;de Geus, Susanna W. L.;Sachs, Teviah E.

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

胆囊癌死亡率高,发病率呈上升趋势。目前的国家综合癌症网络(NCCN)指南建议对所有T1b和更高阶段的癌症进行切除。本研究旨在评估胆囊癌患者的再切除率和相关的生存影响。方法从国家癌症数据库(2004-2015)中筛选胆囊腺癌切除术患者。再切除定义为首次手术后180天内的最终手术。倾向评分是为患者再次切除的几率创建的。患者按1:2配对。采用Kaplan-Meier和Cox比例风险法进行生存分析。结果共纳入6175例患者,其中466例(7.6%)进行了再切除。再切除与中位年龄较年轻(65岁对72岁,p < 0.0001)、私人保险(41.6%对27.1%,p < 0.0001)、学术中心(50.4%对29.7%,p < 0.0001)和治疗地点在东北部(22.8%对20.4%,p = 0.0011)相关。与未进行再切除的患者相比,再切除与pT分期(pT2: 47.6% vs 42.8%, p = 0.0139)和pN分期(pN1-2: 28.1% vs 20.7%, p < 0.0001)、最终病理阴性边缘(90.1% vs 72.6%, p < 0.0001)和接受化疗(53.7% vs 35.8%, p < 0.0001)相关。接受再切除的患者的总生存期(OS)明显高于未接受再切除的患者(中位OS, 44.0 vs 23.0个月;p < 0.0001)。在倾向评分匹配后,再次切除仍然与更高的生存期相关(中位OS, 44.0 vs 31.0个月;p = 0.0004)。结论:胆囊癌的再切除与生存率的提高相关,但仍未得到充分利用,特别是对早期疾病。
Background Gallbladder cancer has a high mortality rate and an increasing incidence. The current National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend resection for all T1b and higher-stage cancers. This study aimed to evaluate re-resection rates and the associated survival impact for patients with gallbladder cancer. Methods Patients with gallbladder adenocarcinoma who underwent resection were identified from the National Cancer Database (2004-2015). Re-resection was defined as definitive surgery within 180 days after the first operation. Propensity scores were created for the odds of a patient having a re-resection. Patients were matched 1:2. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard methods. Results The study identified 6175 patients, and 466 of these patients (7.6%) underwent re-resection. Re-resection was associated with younger median age (65 vs 72 years; p < 0.0001), private insurance (41.6% vs 27.1%; p < 0.0001), academic centers (50.4% vs 29.7%; p < 0.0001), and treatment location in the Northeast (22.8% vs 20.4%; p = 0.0011). Compared with no re-resection, re-resection was associated with pT stage (pT2: 47.6% vs 42.8%; p = 0.0139) and pN stage (pN1-2: 28.1% vs 20.7%; p < 0.0001), negative margins on final pathology (90.1% vs 72.6%; p < 0.0001), and receipt of chemotherapy (53.7% vs 35.8%; p < 0.0001). The patients who underwent re-resection demonstrated significantly longer overall survival (OS) than the patients who did not undergo re-resection (median OS, 44.0 vs 23.0 months; p < 0.0001). After propensity score-matching, re-resection remained associated with superior survival (median OS, 44.0 vs 31.0 months; p = 0.0004). Conclusions Re-resection for gallbladder cancer is associated with improved survival but remains underused, particularly for early-stage disease.