Redundancy in Collaborative Dialogue
Redundancy in Collaborative Dialogue
复制标题
协作对话中的冗余
DOI：
10.3115/992066.992122
复制
发表时间：
1992
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
M. Walker
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
M. Walker
在两个智能体都是自主的对话中，每个智能体都会仔细考虑是否接受或拒绝当前发言者的发言。发言者不能简单地假定一项提议或主张会被接受。然而，对自然发生的问题解决对话语料库的检查表明，代理人通常不会明确表示接受或拒绝。相反，说话人必须根据听话人的下一次对话发言提供的间接证据来推断听话人是否理解并接受当前的发言。在本文中，我提出了一个模型，即信息冗余话语在提供证据以支持关于相互理解和接受的推论方面所起的作用。该模型(1)需要一个支持不同力量的相互信念的互信理论；(2)解释了一类无法用其他解释解释的信息冗余话语的功能；(3)通过展示在没有主从假设的情况下如何推断相互信念，从而为对话理论做出了贡献。
In dialogues in which both agents are autonomous, each agent deliberates whether to accept or reject the contributions of the current speaker. A speaker cannot simply assume that a proposal or an assertion will be accepted. However, an examination of a corpus of naturally-occurring problem-solving dialogues shows that agents often do not explicitly indicate acceptance or rejection. Rather the speaker must infer whether the hearer understands and accepts the current contribution based on indirect evidence provided by the hearer's next dialogue contribution. In this paper, I propose a model of the role of informationally redundant utterances in providing evidence to support inferences about mutual understanding and acceptance. The model (1) requires a theory of mutual belief that supports mutual beliefs of various strengths; (2) explains the function of a class of informationally redundant utterances that cannot be explained by other accounts; and (3) contributes to a theory of dialogue by showing how mutual beliefs can be inferred in the absence of the master-slave assumption.