Hidden in plain sight: The invasive macroalga Caulerpa prolifera evades detection by environmental DNA methods
Hidden in plain sight: The invasive macroalga Caulerpa prolifera evades detection by environmental DNA methods
复制标题
隐藏在众目睽睽之下:入侵性大型藻类 Caulerpa prolifera 逃避环境 DNA 方法的检测
DOI:
10.1002/edn3.496
复制
发表时间:
2024
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Eagle, Robert A.
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Waters, Tanner;Langlois, Kylie;Gold, Zachary;Theroux, Susanna;Eagle, Robert A.
Environmental managers need a rapid and cost‐effective monitoring tool for tracking the spread of invasive species, particularly at the onset of introduction. The macroalgaeCaulerpa proliferais considered an invasive species outside its native range, colonizing large patches of seafloor, reducing native species, and altering ecosystem functioning. Here, we developed a droplet digital PCR assay for detection ofC. proliferafrom environmental DNA seawater samples using the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region. While the assay itself was confirmed to be highly efficient, we discovered concentrations ofC. proliferaeDNA were present below detectable levels in the water column surrounding an outbreak. To understand why, we conducted tank‐based experiments for two California invasive algae species,Caulerpa proliferaandSargassum horneri. The steady‐state eDNA concentration (eDNA copies/ gram of biomass detected) ofC. proliferawas found to be two orders of magnitude lower thanS. horneri. A meta‐analysis of steady‐state concentrations reported in the literature showed a remarkable range from ~104–1011(copies/g), revealingC. proliferato have the lowest recorded steady‐state concentrations of eDNA of any known species. We attributeC. prolifera'slow steady‐state eDNA concentration to its unique biology as a unicellular macroscopic algae which reduces the possible modes of eDNA release compared to similarly sized multicellular organisms. Critically our results demonstrate the potential limits of eDNA approaches, the influence of shedding rates in the reliability of species detections, and the vital importance of benchmarking and validating eDNA assays in both field and laboratory settings.