A randomized trial of computerized vs. in-person brief intervention for illicit drug use in primary care: Outcomes through 12 months
A randomized trial of computerized vs. in-person brief intervention for illicit drug use in primary care: Outcomes through 12 months
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.jsat.2014.09.002
复制
发表时间：
2015-03-01
影响因子：
3.9
通讯作者：
Schwartz, Robert P.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Gryczynski, Jan;Mitchell, Shannon Gwin;Schwartz, Robert P.
本研究检查了一项随机试验 12 个月的结果，该试验比较了计算机化简短干预 (CBI) 与行为健康咨询师为社区健康中心中度药物滥用成人患者 (N = 360) 提供的现场简短干预 (IBI)。数据在基线、3、6 和 12 个月的随访中收集，包括酒精、吸烟和物质参与筛查测试 (ASSIST) 以及头发样本的实验室分析。重复测量分析检查了随时间的差异变化。随着时间或条件的不同，药物阳性毛发测试没有显着差异。两种情况下的总体 ASSIST 分数均下降 (p
This study examined outcomes through 12 months from a randomized trial comparing computerized brief intervention (CBI) vs. in-person brief intervention (IBI) delivered by behavioral health counselors for adult community health center patients with moderate-level drug misuse (N = 360). Data were collected at baseline, 3-, 6-, and 12-month follow-up, and included the Alcohol, Smoking, and Substance Involvement Screening Test (ASSIST) and laboratory analysis of hair samples. Repeated measures analyses examined differential change over time. There were no significant differences in drug-positive hair tests over time or by condition. Global ASSIST scores decreased in both conditions (p