How did international agencies perceive the avian influenza problem? The adoption and manufacture of the "One World, One Health' framework
How did international agencies perceive the avian influenza problem? The adoption and manufacture of the "One World, One Health' framework
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/j.1467-9566.2012.01534.x
复制
发表时间：
2013-02-01
影响因子：
2.9
通讯作者：
Chien, Yu-Ju
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Chien, Yu-Ju
在过去几年中，“同一个世界，同一个健康”政策框架已成为国际上应对禽流感和其他人畜共患传染病的指导原则。包括世界卫生组织、粮食及农业组织和世界动物卫生组织在内的几个政府间专门机构共同赞同并促进了这一框架。这篇文章试图解释为什么国际机构提倡世界卫生组织，尽管它是模糊的。通过研究这些国际机构如何逐渐重新定义禽流感问题，本文说明了国际机构在构建疾病知识和相关政策应对方面的关键作用。报告显示，这三个机构采取了一种包罗万象的方法来减少冲突，捍卫其合法性，促进合作承诺。这一新框架不仅减少了各机构之间的紧张关系，还重塑了其他全球行动者的利益和互动。因此，这个案例说明了这些组织行动者如何积极制造新的认知框架和政策制度，以提高他们自己的合法性和影响力。
Over the past few years, a One World, One Health' (OWOH) policy framework has become the guiding principle for international responses to avian influenza and other zoonotic infectious diseases. Several specialised inter-governmental agencies, including the World Health Organization, the Food and Agricultural Organization and World Organization for Animal Health, jointly endorsed and promoted this framework. This article attempts to explain why international agencies advocated OWOH despite its vagueness. By examining how these international agencies gradually reframed avian flu problems, this article illustrates the crucial roles of international agencies in constructing disease knowledge and relevant policy responses. It shows that the three agencies adopted an all-inclusive approach to reduce conflicts, defend their legitimacy, and facilitate commitment for collaboration. Not only has this new framework reduced tensions between agencies, it has also reshaped the interests and interactions of other global actors. The case thus illustrates how these organisational actors actively manufacture new cognitive frames and policy regimes that advance their own legitimacy and influence.