A smoking cessation induction intervention via virtual reality headset during a dental cleaning: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
A smoking cessation induction intervention via virtual reality headset during a dental cleaning: protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1186/s12889-022-13427-y
复制
发表时间：
2022-05-31
影响因子：
4.5
通讯作者：
Werntz, S.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Borrelli, B.;Endrighi, R.;Jurasic, M. M.;Hernandez, H.;Jones, E.;Ospina, J.;Cabral, H. J.;Quintiliani, L. M.;Werntz, S.
有效的戒烟计划存在，但未被吸烟者，特别是弱势吸烟者充分利用。牙科环境中的戒烟干预措施已被证明是有效的，但由于提供者的负担和缺乏培训，特别是在如何咨询没有戒烟动机的吸烟者方面，戒烟干预措施并不一致。本研究是一项2组、III期纵向随机对照疗效试验，旨在促进使用循证治疗（EBT）戒烟（例如，国家戒烟热线，诊所咨询，国家癌症研究所的短信计划和药物治疗）。在城市牙科诊所就诊的患者（n = 376）将被随机分配到干预组（INT;在牙齿清洁期间通过VR耳机提供戒烟诱导视频，关于EBT的小册子和为期4周的短信程序）或对照组（CTRL;在牙齿清洁期间通过VR耳机提供放松视频，与INT相同的小册子和仅评估的短信）。评估将在基线时、诊所预约后立即、预约后1个月以及3个月和6个月后进行。我们假设INT与CTRL相比更有可能接触EBT，并且EBT的使用率更高。次要目的是检验INT与CTRL相比在戒烟率、戒烟尝试和戒烟动机方面的疗效。将戒烟纳入牙科诊所就诊并针对所有吸烟者，无论戒烟动机如何，都为吸烟者提供了主动接触，否则他们可能不会寻求吸烟治疗。NCT04524533于2020年8月24日注册。
Effective smoking cessation programs exist but are underutilized by smokers, especially by disadvantaged smokers. Cessation interventions in dental settings have been shown to be effective, but are not consistently delivered due to provider burden and lack of training, especially on how to counsel smokers who are not motivated to quit. This study is a 2-arm, phase III longitudinal randomized controlled efficacy trial to motivate utilization of evidenced based treatments (EBTs) for smoking cessation (e.g., state quitline, clinic-based counseling, the National Cancer Institute’s text message program, and pharmacotherapy). Patients attending an urban dental clinic (n = 376) will be randomized to an intervention group (INT; smoking cessation induction video delivered via VR headset during their teeth cleaning, brochure about EBTs, and a 4-week text message program) or control group (CTRL; relaxation video delivered via VR headset during teeth cleaning, the same brochure as INT, and assessment-only text messages). Assessments will occur at baseline, immediately after the clinic appointment, one-month post-appointment and 3-and 6 months later. We hypothesize INT will be more likely to contact EBTs vs CTRL and have greater utilization rates of EBTs. Secondary objectives are to test the efficacy of INT on point-prevalence smoking abstinence, quit smoking attempts, and motivation to quit vs. CTRL. Incorporating smoking cessation into a dental clinic visit and targeting all smokers, regardless of motivation to quit, provides proactive reach to cigarette smokers who otherwise may not seek treatment for smoking. NCT04524533 Registered August 24, 2020.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
5
作者：
COHEN, S;KAMARCK, T;MERMELSTEIN, R
通讯作者：
MERMELSTEIN, R
影响因子：
8.4
作者：
Carr, Alan B.;Ebbert, Jon
通讯作者：
Ebbert, Jon
“这是我的事，是我的身体，是我的钱”：吸烟者的经历，他们不打算在接下来的30天内辞职，并且对治疗选择的看法。
影响因子：
4.5
作者：
Bartlett YK;Gartland N;Wearden A;Armitage CJ;Borrelli B
通讯作者：
Borrelli B
影响因子：
4.4
作者：
Borrelli, B;Mermelstein, R
通讯作者：
Mermelstein, R
影响因子：
4.7
作者：
Brooks, Daniel R.;Burtner, Joanna L.;Geller, Alan C.
通讯作者：
Geller, Alan C.