The Role of Phonetic Distance in the Acquisition of Phonological Alternations
The Role of Phonetic Distance in the Acquisition of Phonological Alternations
复制标题
语音距离在语音交替习得中的作用
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2011
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
S. Peperkamp
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
K. Skoruppa;A. Lambrechts;S. Peperkamp
在音系学中，人们经常注意到，一些音系在类型上比其他音系更频繁。例如，将[i]改变为[u]的交替比将[i]改变为[i]的交替发生得更频繁（Chomsky和Halle，1968）。为了解释这种类型学上的不对称性，许多音系学理论都涉及到它们的语音基础：从语音学的角度来看，类型学上频繁的重复往往是“有意义的”（例如Donegan et al.，1979; Archangeli and Pulleybank，1994）.关于语音的自然性如何引起类型学上的不对称，有两种建议。首先，认知偏见被认为在每个语言学习者的语音习得过程中发挥作用;这些偏见通常有利于语音自然发音的习得（例如Jusczyk，1998; Wilson，2006）。第二，声音的变化，发生在几代人的发言人一直认为，产生更多的语音自然的比不自然的（例如Ohala，1992年; Blevins，2004年）。因此，语音上的自然重复可能在类型学上是频繁的，因为它们更容易获得（共时视角），或者因为它们出现得更频繁（历时视角）。
In phonology, it has often been noted that some regularities are typologically more frequent than others. For example, alternations that change [i] to [u] occur more often than alternations that change [i] into [i] (Chomsky and Halle, 1968). In order to explain such typological asymmetries, many phonological theories refer to their phonetic bases: Typologically frequent regularities tend to ‘make sense’ from a phonetic point of view (e.g. Donegan et al., 1979; Archangeli and Pulleybank, 1994). Two proposals as to how phonetic naturalness gives rise to typological asymmetries are the following. First, cognitive biases have been argued to play a role during phonological acquisition in each individual language learner; these biases typically favor the acquisition of phonetically natural regularities (e.g. Jusczyk, 1998; Wilson, 2006). Second, sound changes that take place over generations of speakers have been argued to yield more phonetically natural regularities than unnatural ones (e.g. Ohala, 1992; Blevins, 2004). Thus, phonetically natural regularities might be typologically frequent because they are easier to acquire (synchronic perspective) or because they arise more frequently (diachronic perspective).
影响因子：
4
作者：
Saffran, JR;Thiessen, ED
通讯作者：
Thiessen, ED