Practice Theory and Postsocialist Civil Society: Toward a New Analytical Framework

Practice Theory and Postsocialist Civil Society: Toward a New Analytical Framework
复制标题

实践理论与后社会主义公民社会:走向新的分析框架

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2021
影响因子:
2.4
通讯作者:
Bojan Baća
Bojan Baća
中科院分区:
法学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Bojan Baća

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

在讨论中欧和东欧的后社会主义公民社会时,学者们主要关注非政府组织(NGO)的非参与性和非政府性活动,有效地将“公民社会”的概念缩小到“公民部门”。这种以行动者为中心的规范性方法导致了对日常抵抗、公民参与、积极的公民身份、有争议的政治和社会运动等结构性较弱的形式的系统性混淆,只给出了该地区民间社会的部分观点。通过对后社会主义公民社会的最新研究和国际政治社会学(IPS)的实践转向之间的批判性对话,本文假设了有争议的和顺从的做法之间的分析区别,以达到一个更全面和细致入微的理解后社会主义公民社会的表现,制定和实现的方式。一方面,拟议的实践转向移动的研究议程远离抽象的,普遍的,什么样的公民社会应该有利于嵌入式的,上下文和批判性的理解它实际上是什么规范的假设;另一方面,这种转变打开了场地,不仅理论化,而且从“后社会主义条件”的公民社会在中欧和东欧的跨国空间。
When discussing postsocialist civil societies in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE), scholars have predominantly focused on the nonparticipatory and advocacy-oriented activities of nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), effectively narrowing the concept of “civil society” to that of the “civic sector.” This actor-focused and normative approach has resulted in a systematic obfuscation of less structured forms of everyday resistance, civic engagement, active citizenship, contentious politics, and social movements, giving only a partial view of civil societies in the region. Through a critical dialogue between state-of-the-art research on postsocialist civil society and the practice turn in international political sociology (IPS), this article postulates an analytical distinction between contentious and compliant practices in order to arrive at a more comprehensive and nuanced understanding of the ways in which postsocialist civil societies are manifested, enacted, and actualized. On the one hand, the proposed practice turn moves the research agenda away from abstract, universalist, and normative assumptions of what civil society should be in favor of an embedded, contextual, and critical understanding of what it actually is; on the other hand, this shift opens venues for theorizing not only about, but also from the “postsocialist condition” of civil societies in the transnational space of CEE.
DOI: 10.1093/ips/olz004
发表时间: 2019-06-01
影响因子: 2.4
作者:
Grimmel, Andreas;Hellmann, Gunther
通讯作者: Hellmann, Gunther