Understanding the Essence of Successful Computing Education Projects through Analyzing NSF Proposals: (Abstract Only)
Understanding the Essence of Successful Computing Education Projects through Analyzing NSF Proposals: (Abstract Only)
复制标题
通过分析 NSF 提案了解成功计算机教育项目的本质：（仅摘要）
DOI：
10.1145/3159450.3162359
复制
发表时间：
2018
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Sitaraman, Murali
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
August, Stephanie E.;Pauley, Mark;Che, S. Megan;Kraemer, Eileen T.;Sitaraman, Murali
您开发了新学习策略的原型，并希望在课堂上或跨机构对其进行测试。您确定了一个支持该想法提案的 NSF 计划，然后呢？提交提案后，审稿人会想到什么？是什么促使一项提案获得资助而另一项提案被拒绝？仔细检查小组评审过程可以为提案的撰写提供信息，并确保评审者能够理解 PI 的想法，识别其优点，并重视 PI 的工作将如何扩大 STEM 教育参与的愿景。本次研讨会逐步介绍了 NSF 提案审查流程，从提交提案到授予或拒绝，涉及良好审查的要素、NSF 知识价值和更广泛的影响标准、良好提案的要素、评估和评价，以及自愿审查提案。参与者可以深入了解撰写良好的评论并改进自己的提案写作。互动研讨会通过介绍相关问题，让参与者参与旨在探索和分享他们对问题的理解的小组练习，并就这些问题提供“专家”意见，引导参与者了解每个主题。示例包括资助和非资助项目以及十大该做和不该做的清单。欲了解更多信息，请参阅：https://people.cs.clemson.edu/~etkraem/UPCSEd/
You develop the prototype for a new learning strategy, and want to test it in class or across institutions. You identify an NSF program that supports proposals for the idea, and then what? What goes through the minds of reviewers once a proposal is submitted? What prompts one proposal to be recommended for funding while another is declined? Close examination of the panel review process can inform proposal writing and ensure that reviewers will understand a PI's idea, identify its merit, and value a PI's vision of how the work will broaden participation in STEM education. This workshop steps through the NSF proposal review process from submission of proposal to award or decline, touching on elements of a good review, NSF intellectual merit and broader impact criteria, elements of a good proposal, assessment and evaluation, and volunteering to review proposals. Participants gain insight into writing a good review and improving one's own proposal writing. The interactive workshop leads participants through each topic by introducing related issues, engaging participants in group exercises designed to explore and share their understanding of the issues, and providing "expert" opinion on these issues. Examples include funded and non-funded projects and a Top Ten List of Do's and Don'ts. For further information see: https://people.cs.clemson.edu/~etkraem/UPCSEd/