Super monsters I: Attitude and Action Role Shift in sign language
Super monsters I: Attitude and Action Role Shift in sign language
复制标题
超级怪兽I：手语的态度与行动角色转变
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2017
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
P. Schlenker
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
P. Schlenker
在手语“角色转换”中，签名者可以从另一个人的角度来报告一个命题态度(‘态度角色转换’)或一个动作(‘动作角色转换’，通常称为‘构造性动作’)；这是通过各种方法来公开标示的，例如手语者身体的旋转和/或眼神的转换。这一操作可以被分析为一些口语中的态度报告所假设的‘语境转换’这一‘可怕’机制的公开例证(Schlenker 2003，Anand&Nevins 2004，Anand 2006，Quer 2005)。对于态度角色转换，我们认为这一分析为语境转换操作的类型学带来了新的曙光：虽然一些手语使角色转换下的视角混合成为可能(Quer 2005)，但我们认为美国手语和LSF遵守索引应该一起转换的限制(Anand 2006)。尽管如此，在ASL和LSF中，仅来自态度角色转换的数据不能完全排除基于引用而没有上下文转换的替代分析。相比之下，行动角色转换在口语中没有固定的对应物，不适合引用分析，因为它被用来描述不涉及任何言语或思想行为的行动；从这一点上说，角色转换是一个可以改变态度报告之外的背景的“超级怪物”。我们发展了一种语境转换分析，既适用于态度，也适用于行动角色转换。(第二部分讨论了这种分析的重要缺陷，该部分用一个解决这些问题的“标志性成分”扩展了这一理论。)
及早访问
补充资料(附录IV)
In sign language ‘Role Shift’, the signer can adopt another person’s perspective to report a propositional attitude (‘Attitude Role Shift’) or an action (‘Action Role Shift’, often called ‘Constructed Action’); this is overtly marked by various means, such as a rotation of the signer’s body and/or eyegaze shift. This operation can be analyzed as an overt instantiation of the ‘monstrous’ mechanism of ‘context shift’ postulated for attitude reports in some spoken languages (Schlenker 2003, Anand & Nevins 2004, Anand 2006, Quer 2005). For Attitude Role Shift, we argue that this analysis brings new light to the typology of context-shifting operations: while some sign languages make it possible to ‘mix perspectives’ under Role Shift (Quer 2005), we argue that ASL and LSF obey the constraint that indexicals should ‘shift together’ (Anand 2006). Still, in ASL and LSF, data from Attitude Role Shift alone cannot fully exclude an alternative analysis based on quotation without context shift. By contrast, Action Role Shift, which has no established counterpart in spoken language, is not amenable to a quotational analysis because it is used to describe actions that don’t involve any speech- or thought-acts; in that respect, Role Shift is a ‘super monster’ that can shift the context outside of attitude reports. We develop a context-shifting analysis that applies both to Attitude and to Action Role Shift. (Important shortcomings of this analysis are discussed in Part II, which extends the theory with an ‘iconic component’ that addresses them.)
EARLY ACCESS
Supplementary Material (Appendix IV)
DOI：
10.1016/j.lingua.2010.07.001
发表时间：
2011
期刊：
Lingua. International review of general linguistics. Revue internationale de linguistique generale
影响因子：
--
作者：
Lillo-Martin,Diane;deQuadros,RoniceMüller
通讯作者：
deQuadros,RoniceMüller