Twixt Method and Madness
Twixt Method and Madness
复制标题
Twixt 方法与疯狂
DOI：
10.1007/978-94-009-3519-8_2
复制
发表时间：
1987
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
T. Nickles
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
T. Nickles
多年来，我一直主张，科学方法比哲学的眼光更重要。一些备受吹捧的方法概念--例如假设演绎法（H-D）--在涉及细节时就显得非常单薄。因为当一个人研究解决问题和理论建构的真实的科学案例时，方法论特征几乎总是比他在一般方法论叙述中读到的内容更有实质性，更有趣。天地间还有更多的东西……”
For years I have urged that there is more to scientific method than meets the philosophical eye. Some highly touted conceptions of method — the hypothetical-deductive (H-D) method, for instance — are remarkably thin when it gets down to details. For when one studies real scientific cases of problem solving and theory construction, the methodological features are almost always more substantive and more interesting than what one reads in general methodological accounts. There are more things in heaven and earth...’