The Principled Case for Employing Private Military and Security Companies in Interventions for Human Rights Purposes
The Principled Case for Employing Private Military and Security Companies in Interventions for Human Rights Purposes
复制标题
雇用私营军事和保安公司进行人权干预的原则案例
DOI：
10.1111/j.1468-5930.2011.00548.x
复制
发表时间：
2011
影响因子：
1.1
通讯作者：
BAKER D
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
BAKER D
利用私营军事和安保公司加强为人权目的进行干预（人道主义干预和维持和平）的能力的可能性，已引起越来越多的辩论。然而，这种讨论的重点主要是实际问题和私人力量造成的附带问题。相比之下，本文认为，人道主义干预私有化的原则情况。报告着重于两个中心问题。首先，在这种情况下，将人道主义干预外包给私营军事和保安公司是否会带来一些根本性的、更深层次的问题，例如放弃国家的职责？第二，另一方面，是否有理由更喜欢这些公司，而不是其他基于国家的人道主义干预机构？例如，考虑到国家对本国军事人员的责任，在人道主义干预方面，是否应该优先使用私营军事和安保承包商，而不是正规士兵？
The possibility of using private military and security companies to bolster the capacity to undertake intervention for human rights purposes (humanitarian intervention and peacekeeping) has been increasingly debated. The focus of such discussions has, however, largely been on practical issues and the contingent problems posed by private force. By contrast, this article considers the principled case for privatising humanitarian intervention. It focuses on two central issues. First, does outsourcing humanitarian intervention to private military and security companies pose some fundamental, deeper problems in this context, such as an abdication of a state's duties? Second, on the other hand, is there a case for preferring these firms to other, state‐based agents of humanitarian intervention? For instance, given a state's duties to their own military personnel, should the use of private military and security contractors be preferred to regular soldiers for humanitarian intervention?
监管私营军事和保安公司：蒙特勒文件的内容、谈判、弱点和承诺
影响因子：
0.8
作者：
James Cockayne
通讯作者：
James Cockayne
超越国界的正义：全球政治理论
影响因子：
7.6
作者：
S. Caney
通讯作者：
S. Caney