Uncovering European Union Immigration Legislation: Policy Dynamics and Outcomes
Uncovering European Union Immigration Legislation: Policy Dynamics and Outcomes
复制标题
揭秘欧盟移民立法：政策动态和结果
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2011
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
A. Luedtke
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
A. Luedtke
欧洲联盟（EU）成员国最近尝试建立一个共同的移民政策。这就引出了一个重要而有趣的问题：一旦移民政策不再由各国首都制定，会发生什么？各国政府是否能够保留对欧盟移民政策领域的最终控制权？或者我们会看到欧盟委员会、议会和法院扩大其影响力，从而滑向超国家权力？如果欧盟机构获得了权力，它们会利用这种权力来捍卫移民的权利和自由，反对实行限制主义的国家政府吗？通过参与者访谈（见附录1）和文献分析，我分析了三个欧盟移民法的谈判：关于家庭团聚、长期居留和经济移民的指令。我评估这些指令中是否实施了国家偏好，或者超国家机构是否将政策偏离了国家偏好，从而潜在地扩大了移民的权利和自由。
The member states of the European Union (EU) have recently experimented with constructing a common immigration policy. This gives rise to an important and fascinating question: what happens to immigration policy once it is no longer made in national capitals? Have national governments been able to retain ultimate control over the field of EU immigration policy? Or do we see slippage towards supranational power, with the Commission, Parliament, and Court of Justice expanding their influence? If EU institutions have gained power, do they use this power to defend the rights and freedoms of immigrants against restrictionist national governments? Using participant interviews (listed in Appendix I) and documentary analysis, I analyse negotiations over three EU immigration laws: the directives on family reunification, long-term residence, and economic migration. I assess whether national preferences are implemented in these directives, or whether supranational institutions have moved policy away from national preferences, potentially expanding immigrant rights and freedoms.