Effectiveness, medication patterns, and adverse events of traditional chinese herbal patches for osteoarthritis: a systematic review.
Effectiveness, medication patterns, and adverse events of traditional chinese herbal patches for osteoarthritis: a systematic review.
复制标题
中药贴剂治疗骨关节炎的疗效、用药模式和不良反应:系统评价
DOI:
10.1155/2014/343176
复制
发表时间:
2014
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Zhan H
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Wang X;Wei S;Liu T;Pang J;Gao N;Ding D;Duan T;Cao Y;Zheng Y;Zhan H
Objective. The aim of this study is to systematically evaluate the evidence whether traditional Chinese herbal patches (TCHPs) for osteoarthritis (OA) are effective and safe and analyze their medication patterns. Methods. A systematic literature search was performed using all the possible Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and keywords from January 1979 to July 2013. Both randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies were included. Estimated effects were analyzed using mean difference (MD) or relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and meta-analysis. Results. 86 kinds of TCHPs were identified. RCTs and controlled clinical trials (CCTs) which were mostly of low quality favored TCHPs for local pain and dysfunction relief. TCHPs, compared with diclofenac ointment, had significant effects on global effectiveness rate (RR = 0.50; 95% CI (0.29, 0.87)). Components of formulae were mainly based on the compounds “Xiao Huo Luo Dan” (Minor collateral-freeing pill) and “Du Huo Ji Sheng Tang” (Angelicae Pubescentis and Loranthi decoction). Ten kinds of adverse events (AEs), mainly consisting of itching and/or local skin rashes, were identified after 3-4 weeks of follow-up. Conclusions. TCHPs have certain evidence in improving global effectiveness rate for OA; however, more rigorous studies are warranted to support their use.