Adverse effect of donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies directed at HLA-DP/-DQ on engraftment in cord blood transplantation

Adverse effect of donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies directed at HLA-DP/-DQ on engraftment in cord blood transplantation
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.jcyt.2022.10.005
复制
发表时间:
2023-03-08
期刊:
影响因子:
4.5
通讯作者:
Kimura, Takafumi
Kimura, Takafumi
中科院分区:
医学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Jo, Tomoyasu;Arai, Yasuyuki;Kimura, Takafumi

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

背景目标:尽管移植前受体中的供体特异性抗人类白细胞抗原(HLA)抗体(DSA)与脐带血移植(CBT)中的移植物衰竭相关,但对DSA而非抗HLA-A、-B或-DRB 1对移植结果的影响仍知之甚少。方法:我们回顾性分析了567名单单位CBT接受者,以评估DSA对HLADP和-DQ对CBT结局的影响。结果:在143名(25.2%)具有抗HLA抗体的受者中,9名携带针对HLA-DP或-DQ的DSA。与没有抗HLA抗体的患者相比,抗HLA-DP或-DQ的DSA与移植后100天显著较低的中性粒细胞植入率(55.6%对91.8%,P = 0.032)和略微较低的血小板植入率(46.7%对75.3%,P = 0.128)相关。HLA-DP或-DQ DSA患者的中性粒细胞和血小板植入时间显著长于无抗HLA抗体的患者(中性粒细胞中的中位数为25 vs 21天,P = 0.002;血小板中的中位数为61 vs 46天,P = 0.014)。与没有抗HLA抗体的患者相比,具有抗HLA-DP或-DQ DSA的患者在第100天的细菌感染累积发生率显著更高(88.9%对57.1%,P = 0.024),无再次移植存活率略低(55.6%对76.8%,P = 0.132)。这些发现表明,针对HLA-DP或-DQ的DSA导致不利的植入,这可能增加细菌感染的风险,并降低CBT后不久的生存率。结论:我们的研究结果表明,评估DSA对HLA-DP和DQ受体选择CB单位之前的重要性。(c)2022国际细胞与基因治疗学会爱思唯尔公司出版
Background aims: While donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies (DSAs) in the recipient before transplantation are associated with graft failure in cord-blood transplantation (CBT), effects of DSAs other than against HLA-A, -B or -DRB1 on transplantation outcomes remained poorly understood. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 567 single-unit CBT recipients to evaluate impact of DSAs against HLADP and -DQ on CBT outcomes. Results: Among 143 recipients (25.2%) who had anti-HLA antibodies, nine harbored DSAs against HLA-DP or -DQ. DSAs against HLA-DP or -DQ were associated with a significantly lower neutrophil engraftment rate (55.6% versus 91.8%, P = 0.032) and with a marginally lower platelet engraftment rate (46.7% versus 75.3%, P = 0.128) at day 100 after transplantation, compared with patients without anti-HLA antibodies. Time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment in patients with DSAs for HLA-DP or -DQ was significantly longer than that in patients without anti-HLA antibodies (median, 25 versus 21 days, P = 0.002 in neutrophil; median 61 versus 46 days, P = 0.014 in platelet). Cumulative incidence of bacterial infection at day 100 was significantly greater (88.9% versus 57.1%, P = 0.024), and re-transplant-free survival was marginally lower (55.6% versus 76.8%, P = 0.132) in patients with DSAs against HLA-DP or -DQ, compared with those without anti-HLA antibodies. These findings suggest that DSAs against HLA-DP or -DQ lead to unfavorable engraftment, which may increase risk of bacterial infection, and reduce survival soon after CBT. Conclusions: Our results suggest the importance of evaluating DSAs against HLA-DP and -DQ in recipients before selecting CB units. (c) 2022 International Society for Cell & Gene Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc.