The Debate about Luxury in Eighteenth- and Nineteenth-Century French Political Thought
The Debate about Luxury in Eighteenth- and Nineteenth-Century French Political Thought
复制标题
十八、十九世纪法国政治思想中关于奢侈的争论
DOI：
10.1353/jhi.2007.0004
复制
发表时间：
2007
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
J. Jennings
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
J. Jennings
本文探讨了法国十八世纪和十九世纪政治思想中关于奢侈的美德和其他方面的争论。我首先对比让-雅克·卢梭和让-弗朗索瓦·梅隆的观点。鉴于孟德斯鸠、狄德罗、圣兰伯特和其他人提出这一论点的方式，我认为关于奢侈的争论一直持续到 1789 年法国大革命及其之后。然后，通过考察让-巴蒂斯特·萨伊和德斯特图特·德·特雷西的著作，本文展示了 19 世纪初期关于奢侈的争论的持续突出性，以及卢梭反对奢侈的论点的持久性。共和党人的财富过多。它的结论是提到了第二帝国奢华的讨论。
This article explores the debate about the virtues and otherwise of luxury in French eighteenth- and nineteenth political thought. I begin by contrasting the views of Jean-Jacques Rousseau and Jean-Francois Melon. In view of the manner in which this argument was developed by Montesquieu, Diderot, Saint-Lambert, and others, I argue that debates about luxury continued into and beyond the French Revolution of 1789. Then, by looking at the writings of Jean-Baptiste Say and Destutt de Tracy the article demonstrates the coninued prominence of debates about luxury in the early years of the nineteenth century and the enduring nature of the arguments posed by Rousseau against immoderate wealth amongst republicans. It concludes by referring to discussions of luxury in the Second Empire.