Accent, standard language ideology, and discriminatory pretext in the courts

Accent, standard language ideology, and discriminatory pretext in the courts
复制标题

口音、标准语言意识形态和法庭上的歧视性借口

DOI:
10.1017/s0047404500017826
复制
发表时间:
1994
影响因子:
1.5
通讯作者:
Rosina L. Lippi
Rosina L. Lippi
中科院分区:
人文科学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Rosina L. Lippi

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

美国民权法案第七章明确禁止雇主基于个人或顾客偏好歧视有色人种。同样,不得以与民族血统有关的语言特征为由拒绝合格的求职者。然而,与种族歧视形成对比的是,雇主在语言问题上有相当大的自由度,这部分是由司法制度提供的,司法制度在理论上承认语言与社会身份之间的联系,但在实践中往往因盲目坚持标准的语言意识形态而感到困惑。本文探讨了这种语言歧视的性质和影响。(语言和法律,口音,歧视,标准语言意识形态,批判性语言研究)
ABSTRACT Title VII of the U.S. Civil Rights Act clearly forbids an employer to discriminate against persons of color for reasons of personal or customer preference. Similarly, a qualified job applicant may not be rejected on the basis of linguistic traits linked to national origin. In contrast to racial discrimination, however, an employer has considerable latitude in matters of language, provided in part by a judicial system which recognizes in theory the link between language and social identity, but in practice is often confounded by blind adherence to a standard language ideology. The nature and repercussions of this type of linguistic discrimination are here explored. (Language and law, accent, discrimination, standard language ideology, critical language studies)