Study of the psychometric qualities of the Brief Social Phobia Scale (BSPS) in Brazilian university students

Study of the psychometric qualities of the Brief Social Phobia Scale (BSPS) in Brazilian university students
复制标题

DOI:
10.1016/j.eurpsy.2009.08.002
复制
发表时间:
2010-04-01
影响因子:
7.8
通讯作者:
Loureiro, S. R.
Loureiro, S. R.
中科院分区:
医学2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Osorio, F. L.;Crippa, J. A. S.;Loureiro, S. R.

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

目的:进行心理测量分析的巴西版本的简短社交恐惧症量表(BSPS)。材料和方法:百七十八名大学生的性别,平均年龄为21.2岁,并确定为社交焦虑障碍(SAD)的情况下,非案件进行了研究,与结构化的临床访谈DSM-IV被用作参数。在评分员和观察员在场的情况下,以个人方式应用不同的工具。BSPS显示出足够的内部一致性(0.48-0.88)和Beck焦虑量表(BAI)的同时效度和发散效度(0.21-0.62)、社交恐惧量表(0.24-0.82)和演讲自我陈述量表(0.23-0.31)。判别效度显示敏感性为0.88-0.90,特异性为0.81(截止值为18/19时为0.83)。析因分析表明,六个因素的存在,共同解释71.79%的数据方差。结构效度表明该量表在SAD诊断方面存在一定的局限性。结论:BSPS适合大学生使用,但仍需在不同文化、样本和情境下进一步研究。(C)2009年Elsevier Masson SAS。All rights reserved.
Purpose: To perform a psychometric analysis of the Brazilian version of the Brief Social Phobia Scale (BSPS).Materials and methods: Hundred and seventy-eight university students of both genders aged on average 21.2 years and identified as Social Anxiety Disorder (SAD) cases and non-cases was studied, with the structured clinical interview for DSM-IV being used as a parameter. The different instruments were applied in an individual manner in the presence of a rater and of an observer.Results: The BSPS showed adequate internal consistency (0.48-0.88) and concurrent and divergent validity with the Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI) (0.21-0.62), Social Phobia Inventory (0.24-0.82) and Self Statements During Public Speaking Scale (SSPS) (0.23-0.31). Discriminative validity revealed a sensitivity of 0.88-0.90 and a specificity of 0.81(0.83 for cut-off notes of 18/19. Factorial analysis demonstrated the presence of six factors that jointly explained 71.79% of data variance. Construct validity indicated some limits of the scale regarding the diagnosis of SAD. Inter-rater reliability was strong (0.86-1.00, p < 0.001).Conclusions: The BSPS is adequate for use with university students, although further studies in different cultures, samples and contexts are still necessary. (C) 2009 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.