PARTICIPATORY POLICYMAKING ACROSS CULTURAL COGNITIVE DIVIDES: TWO TESTS OF CULTURAL BIASING IN PUBLIC FORUM DESIGN AND DELIBERATION: CULTURAL COGNTIVE DIVIDES
PARTICIPATORY POLICYMAKING ACROSS CULTURAL COGNITIVE DIVIDES: TWO TESTS OF CULTURAL BIASING IN PUBLIC FORUM DESIGN AND DELIBERATION: CULTURAL COGNTIVE DIVIDES
复制标题
跨文化认知鸿沟的参与式政策制定：公共论坛设计和审议中文化偏见的两项测试：文化认知鸿沟
DOI：
10.1111/padm.12255
复制
发表时间：
2016
影响因子：
3.5
通讯作者：
BRAMAN, DON
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
GASTIL, JOHN;KNOBLOCH, KATHERINE R.;KAHAN, DAN;BRAMAN, DON
深思熟虑的理论家认为，高度结构化的面对面政策讨论可以超越意识形态差异。相比之下，文化认知理论家认为，人们的文化取向限制了与政策相关的信息处理，并阻止了公众达成共识的能力。两项研究考察了商议过程是否可以跨越不同的文化取向。第一个评估是评估一个重要的审议论坛方案在两维文化网格的象限内制定政策解决方案的能力。第二项研究考察了商议是否会产生超越偏见的政策建议，从而产生跨文化共识。结果表明，公众讨论可以包含多种文化取向，并鼓励参与者超越偏见，找到共同点。在制定和实施协商公共论坛时，文化取向似乎是可以克服的障碍。
Deliberative theorists posit that highly structured face‐to‐face policy discussions can transcend ideological differences. By contrast, cultural cognitive theorists argue that people's cultural orientations constrain policy‐relevant information processing and forestall the public's ability to reach consensus. Two studies examine whether deliberative processes can span divergent cultural orientations. The first assesses a prominent deliberative forum programme's capacity to frame policy solutions across the quadrants of a two‐dimensional cultural grid. The second study examines whether deliberation generates policy recommendations that transcend biases to yield cross‐cultural agreement. Results show that public deliberation can encompass multiple cultural orientations and encourage participants to look beyond their biases to discover common ground. When it comes to framing and implementing deliberative public forums, cultural orientations appear to be surmountable obstacles.