Feedback Related Negativity Amplitude is Greatest Following Deceptive Feedback in Autistic Adolescents
Feedback Related Negativity Amplitude is Greatest Following Deceptive Feedback in Autistic Adolescents
复制标题
DOI：
10.1007/s10803-023-06038-y
复制
发表时间：
2023-07-01
影响因子：
3.9
通讯作者：
Gable，Philip A.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Riek，Nathan T.;Susam，Busra T.;Gable，Philip A.
本研究的目的是探讨反馈相关负性（FRN）是否能捕捉到自闭症青少年瞬间升高的情绪反应。对反应性升高的测量可以使临床医生更好地支持自闭症患者，而不需要自我报告或口头传达。本研究调查了46名自闭症青少年（年龄12 - 21岁）完成情感波斯纳任务的反应，该任务利用欺骗性反馈来引发表现为挫折的痛苦。FRN事件相关电位（ERP）作为情绪反应的瞬时定量神经测量。我们使用FRN、连续试验中的反应时间和情绪失调量表（EDI）反应评分，将欺骗性和令人痛苦的反馈与真实但令人痛苦的反馈以及真实和非痛苦的反馈进行比较。结果表明，FRN值是最负的欺骗性反馈相比，真实的非痛苦的反馈。此外，痛苦的反馈导致更快的反应时间在连续的试验平均。最后，与反应性分数较低的参与者相比，EDI反应性分数较高的参与者在非痛苦真实反馈方面具有更多的负FRN值。FRN振幅显示基于挫折和反应性的变化。本研究结果支持在未来的研究中使用FRN来更好地了解自闭症青少年的情绪调节过程。此外，基于反应性的FRN的变化表明可能需要基于反应性对自闭症青少年进行分组并相应地调整干预措施。
The purpose of this study is to investigate if feedback related negativity (FRN) can capture instantaneous elevated emotional reactivity in autistic adolescents. A measurement of elevated reactivity could allow clinicians to better support autistic individuals without the need for self-reporting or verbal conveyance. The study investigated reactivity in 46 autistic adolescents (ages 12–21 years) completing the Affective Posner Task which utilizes deceptive feedback to elicit distress presented as frustration. The FRN event-related potential (ERP) served as an instantaneous quantitative neural measurement of emotional reactivity. We compared deceptive and distressing feedback to both truthful but distressing feedback and truthful and non-distressing feedback using the FRN, response times in the successive trial, and Emotion Dysregulation Inventory (EDI) reactivity scores. Results revealed that FRN values were most negative to deceptive feedback as compared to truthful non-distressing feedback. Furthermore, distressing feedback led to faster response times in the successive trial on average. Lastly, participants with higher EDI reactivity scores had more negative FRN values for non-distressing truthful feedback compared to participants with lower reactivity scores. The FRN amplitude showed changes based on both frustration and reactivity. The findings of this investigation support using the FRN to better understand emotion regulation processes for autistic adolescents in future work. Furthermore, the change in FRN based on reactivity suggests the possible need to subgroup autistic adolescents based on reactivity and adjust interventions accordingly.