Governing Vitalities and the Security State
Governing Vitalities and the Security State
复制标题
治理活力与安全状态
DOI：
10.1068/d13002p
复制
发表时间：
2014
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
G. Kearns
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
G. Kearns
国家规范生活的技术既是空间性的，也是地缘政治性的。福柯曾论述过一种广泛的转变，即从国家对领土的关注（侧重于对饥荒和流行病等威胁的管控），转向对人口的现代关注，这种关注转而优先考虑一系列日常危险，这些危险要通过对个人持续采取行动以及个人自身的持续行动来避免。在本文中，我认为领土性在地缘政治特征上比福柯所暗示的更为明显，且持续具有更重要的意义。这种地缘政治涉及全球政治经济以及被福柯以国家为中心（而非多个国家为中心）的方法所掩盖的帝国主义和殖民主义形式。
The techniques by which states regulate life are both spatial and geopolitical. Foucault wrote of a broad transition from a state concern with territory focused on regulating threats such as famine and epidemics, to a modern concern with population that prioritised instead a set of everyday dangers that were to be averted by continual action for and upon individuals. In this paper I argue that territoriality is more geopolitical in character and more continually significant than Foucault suggested. This geopolitics implicates a global political economy and forms of imperialism and colonialism occluded by Foucault's state-centric rather than states-centric approach.
重要地理：生命、运气和人类状况
DOI：
10.1080/00045600902967177
发表时间：
2009
期刊：
Annals of the Association of American Geographers
影响因子：
--
作者：
Kearns G
通讯作者：
Kearns G