Abuse and Misuse of the Term "Guild" in Ecological Studies

Abuse and Misuse of the Term "Guild" in Ecological Studies
复制标题

生态研究中“行会”一词的滥用和误用

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
1981
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Fabian M Jaksic
Fabian M Jaksic
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Fabian M Jaksic

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

在其最初的定义中,行业协会是指一组以类似方式使用给定资源的共生生物,而不考虑它们的分类关系。我认为,这个术语被研究人员滥用,他们以先验的方式定义了行会(任何一组共位的,分类学上相关的生物体,即,集合),并被研究人员滥用,定义行业协会后验(分组内的集合)。我将讨论这些做法的后果以及行业协会结构与竞争之间的关系。
In its original definition, guild refers to a group of syntopic organisms using a given resource in a similar way, without regard to their taxonomic relationships. I contend that this term is abused by researchers that define guilds in a-priori manner (any group of syntopic, taxonomically related organisms, i.e., an assemblage), and misused by researchers that define guilds a-posteriori (subgroups within assemblages). I discuss the consequences of these practices and the relationship between guild structure and competition.