An American view of the ICD-10 personality disorders.
An American view of the ICD-10 personality disorders.
复制标题
美国人对 ICD-10 人格障碍的看法。
DOI：
10.1111/j.1600-0447.1990.tb03061.x
复制
发表时间：
1990
影响因子：
6.7
通讯作者：
Blashfield,RK
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Blashfield,RK
对1986年版ICD-10人格障碍诊断标准进行了分析。在这项研究的一个部分，美国的临床医生被要求将ICD-10标准归入ICD-10类别。在第二部分中，ICD-10标准被分配到DSM-III-R类别。在第一部分中，ICD-10标准的面孔效度具有很高的变异性。超过80%的临床医生将30%的标准分配给了正确的父母类别。相比之下，34%的标准未能被至少一半的临床医生正确分配。在ICD-10和DSM-III-R类别之间的对应关系上，只有强迫(ICD)和强迫(DSM)表现出较高的对应水平。焦虑(ICD)与回避(DSM)、冲动(ICD)与边缘(DSM)、装腔作势(ICD)与装腔作势(DSM)的对应较差。
The 1986 version of the ICD‐10 diagnostic criteria for the personality disorders was analyzed. In one part of the study, clinicians in the United States were asked to assign the ICD‐10 criteria to the ICD‐10 categories. In a second part, the ICD‐10 criteria were assigned to DSM‐III‐R categories. In the first part, the face validities of the ICD‐10 criteria were highly variable. Thirty percent of the criteria were assigned to the correct parent category by over 80% of the clinicians. In contrast, 34% of the criteria failed to be correctly assigned by at least half of the clinicians. Concerning the correspondence between ICD‐10 and DSM‐III‐R categories, only anankastic (ICD) and obsessive‐compulsive (DSM) showed a high level of correspondence. The correspondences of anxious (ICD) with avoidant (DSM), impulsive (ICD) with borderline (DSM), and histrionic (ICD) with histrionic (DSM) were poor.