Thinking Styles: The Principles and Development of Thinking Styles
Thinking Styles: The Principles and Development of Thinking Styles
复制标题
思维方式：思维方式的原理和发展
DOI：
10.1017/cbo9780511584152
复制
发表时间：
1997
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
R. Sternberg
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
R. Sternberg
在我们的社会中，对人才的认可在很大程度上取决于对学业成就和工作表现的理想化和根深蒂固的看法。心理学家罗伯特·斯特恩伯格在《思维方式》一书中指出，能力往往得不到赏识和培养，不是因为缺乏天赋，而是因为思维和学习的风格相互冲突。通过使用从科学研究到个人轶事的各种例子，斯特恩伯格博士提出了一种思维风格理论，旨在解释为什么能力倾向测试、学校成绩和课堂表现往往无法确定真正的能力。他认为，不幸的是，学校和工作场所的智力标准都是基于顺从的能力，而不是学习的能力。他将这一理论推向了更远的一步，他指出，“成就”可能是个人和机构思维方式相容的结果，而“失败”往往是思维方式冲突的结果，而不是缺乏智力或能力。斯特恩伯格博士以一种任何受过教育的读者都能理解的方式展示了他的革命性思想。这本具有挑衅性的书提出了衡量成就的方式的真正改变，并将激励教育工作者、雇主和家长。
In our society, the recognition of talent depends largely on idealized and entrenched perceptions of academic achievement and job performance. In Thinking Styles, psychologist Robert Sternberg argues that ability often goes unappreciated and uncultivated not because of lack of talent, but because of conflicting styles of thinking and learning. Using a variety of examples that range from scientific studies to personal anecdotes, Dr. Sternberg presents a theory of thinking styles that aims to explain why aptitude tests, school grades, and classroom performance often fail to identify real ability. He believes that criteria for intelligence in both school and the workplace are unfortunately based on the ability to conform rather than to learn. He takes this theory a step farther by stating that" achievement" can be a result of the compatability of personal and institutional thinking styles, and" failure" is too often a result of a conflict of thinking styles, rather than a lack of intelligence or aptitude. Dr. Sternberg presents his revolutionary ideas in a way that is accessible to any educated reader. This provocative book suggests a real change in how we measure achievement and will inspire educators, employers, and parents alike.