Ca2+ binding to EF hands 1 and 3 is essential for the interaction of apoptosis-linked gene-2 with Alix/AIP1 in ocular melanoma.
Ca2+ binding to EF hands 1 and 3 is essential for the interaction of apoptosis-linked gene-2 with Alix/AIP1 in ocular melanoma.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1021/bi048848d
复制
发表时间:
2004-09
期刊:
影响因子:
2.9
通讯作者:
L. Subramanian;J. Crabb;J. Cox;I. Durussel;T. M. Walker;P. R. Van Ginkel;S. Bhattacharya;Julia M Dellaria;K. Palczewski;A. Polans
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
L. Subramanian;J. Crabb;J. Cox;I. Durussel;T. M. Walker;P. R. Van Ginkel;S. Bhattacharya;Julia M Dellaria;K. Palczewski;A. Polans
Apoptosis-linked gene-2 (ALG-2) encodes a 22 kDa Ca(2+)-binding protein of the penta EF-hand family that is required for programmed cell death in response to various apoptotic agents. Here, we demonstrate that ALG-2 mRNA and protein are down-regulated in human uveal melanoma cells compared to their progenitor cells, normal melanocytes. The down regulation of ALG-2 may provide melanoma cells with a selective advantage. ALG-2 and its putative target molecule, Alix/AIP1, are localized primarily in the cytoplasm of melanocytes and melanoma cells independent of the intracellular Ca(2+) concentration or the activation of apoptosis. Cross-linking and analytical centrifugation studies support a single-species dimer conformation of ALG-2, also independent of Ca(2+) concentration. However, binding of Ca(2+) to both EF-1 and EF-3 is necessary for ALG-2 interaction with Alix/AIP1 as demonstrated using surface plasmon resonance spectroscopy. Mutations in EF-5 result in reduced target interaction without alteration in Ca(2+) affinity. The addition of N-terminal ALG-2 peptides, residues 1-22 or residues 7-17, does not alter the interaction of ALG-2 or an N-terminal deletion mutant of ALG-2 with Alix/AIP1, as might be expected from a model derived from the crystal structure of ALG-2. Fluorescence studies of ALG-2 demonstrate that an increase in surface hydrophobicity is primarily due to Ca(2+) binding to EF-3, while Ca(2+) binding to EF-1 has little effect on surface exposure of hydrophobic residues. Together, these data indicate that gross surface hydrophobicity changes are insufficient for target recognition.