Considering embodied energy and carbon in heritage buildings - a review
Considering embodied energy and carbon in heritage buildings - a review
复制标题
考虑遗产建筑中的能源和碳——回顾
DOI：
10.1088/1755-1315/329/1/012002
复制
发表时间：
2019
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Wise F
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Wise F
大约20%的英国建筑可以被定义为“遗产建筑”，提供了应该被保护的独特价值。它们往往比新建筑使用更多的能源，为能源改造创造了一个强有力的理由，以减少能源使用，温室气体排放，并提高热舒适度。然而，很少有遗产改造研究体现的影响，这是能源和碳的影响，需要制造，运输和建设材料和组件。本研究通过系统的文献回顾和专题分析，考虑了改造文物建筑的整个生命周期（具体加操作）的影响。它的结论是：在改造项目中，应考虑具体影响和运营影响，就生命周期而言，改造优于拆除和重建，缺乏衡量生命周期影响的政策规定，低影响改造更有利于保护遗产价值和减少隐含碳。
Approximately 20% of UK buildings can be defined as ‘heritage buildings’, offering unique values that should be preserved. They tend to use more energy than newer buildings, creating a strong case for energy retrofits to reduce energy use, greenhouse gas emissions, and improve thermal comfort. However, few studies of heritage retrofits examine embodied impacts, which are the energy and carbon impacts required to manufacture, transport and construct materials and components. This study considers the whole life (embodied plus operational) impacts of retrofitting heritage buildings, through a systematic literature review and thematic analysis. It concludes that; both embodied and operational impacts should be considered in retrofitting projects, retrofitting is better than demolish and rebuild in lifecycle terms, there is a lack of policy mandating for the measurement of lifecycle impacts and low impact retrofitting can be better for conserving heritage values and reducing embodied carbon.