Physics and the emergence of molecular biology: A history of cognitive and political synergy
Physics and the emergence of molecular biology: A history of cognitive and political synergy
复制标题
物理学和分子生物学的出现：认知和政治协同的历史
DOI：
10.1007/bf00136376
复制
发表时间：
1990
影响因子：
0.8
通讯作者：
E. Keller
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
E. Keller
Journal of the History of Biology，vol. 23，no. 3（Fall 1990），pp. 389-409. ? 1990 Kluwer Academic Publishers.在荷兰印刷。1.参见，例如，Pnina Abir-Am，“20世纪30年代体力和生物学知识的讨论：洛克菲勒基金会分子生物学“政策”的重新评估”，Soc.Stud.Sci.，12（1982），341-382;同上，“超越决定论社会学和辩护历史：重新评估研究政策对新科学学科的影响（回复富尔斯特，巴特尔斯，奥尔比和约克森），”Soc. Stud. Sci.，14（1984），252-263; Ditta Bartels，“The Rockefeller Foundation's Funding Policy for Molecular Biology：Success or Failure，”ibid，pp. 238-243; Donald Fleming，“'migr6 Physicists and the Biological Revolution，”Perspect.美国历史，2（1968），152-189; John A.富尔斯特，“还原论在分子生物学发展中的作用：外围还是中心？“Soc.Stud.Sci.，12（1982），241-278;同上，“分子生物学的定义和政策的定义：洛克菲勒基金会分子生物学政策的作用”，Soc.Stud.Sci.，14（1984），225-237;莉莉凯，“生命的秘密：尼尔斯玻尔对马克斯德尔布鲁克生物学计划的影响，”里夫。Stor.科学，2（1985），487-510;同上，“Molecular Biology and Pauling's Immunochemistry：A Neglected Dimension，”Hist. Phil.生命科学，10（1988），51-72;罗伯特科勒，“科学管理：沃伦韦弗和洛克菲勒基金会分子生物学计划的经验，”密涅瓦，14（1976），279-306;罗伯特奥尔比，双重障碍的道路（西雅图：华盛顿大学出版社，1974年）;同上，“治安官和牛仔：或者，韦弗对阿斯特伯里和鲍林的支持，”Soc.Stud.Sci.，14（1984），244-247; Edward J. Yoxen，“Where Does Schrodinger's 'What Is Life？在分子生物学史上的地位？“历史科学，17（1979），17-52;同上，“Giving Life a New Meaning：The Rise of the Molecular Biology Establishment，”Sociol. Sci.，6（1982），123-143;同上，“Scepticism about the Centrality of Technology Transfer in the Rockefeller Foundation Programme in Molecular Biology，”Soc. Stud. Sci.，14（1984），248252。
Journal of the History of Biology, vol. 23, no. 3 (Fall 1990), pp. 389-409. ? 1990 Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. 1. See, e.g., Pnina Abir-Am, "The Discourse of Physical Power and Biological Knowledge in the 1930's: A Reappraisal of the Rockefeller Foundation's 'Policy' in Molecular Biology," Soc. Stud. Sci., 12 (1982), 341-382; idem, "Beyond Deterministic Sociology and Apologetic History: Reassessing the Impact of Research Policy upon New Scientific Disciplines (reply to Fuerst, Bartels, Olby, and Yoxen)," Soc. Stud. Sci., 14 (1984), 252-263; Ditta Bartels, "The Rockefeller Foundation's Funding Policy for Molecular Biology: Success or Failure," ibid, pp. 238-243; Donald Fleming, "'migr6 Physicists and the Biological Revolution," Perspect. Amer. Hist., 2 (1968), 152-189; John A. Fuerst, "The Role of Reductionism in the Development of Molecular Biology: Peripheral or Central?" Soc. Stud. Sci., 12 (1982), 241-278; idem, "The Definition of Molecular Biology and the Definition of Policy: The Role of the Rockefeller Foundation's Policy for Molecular Biology," Soc. Stud. Sci., 14 (1984), 225-237; Lily Kay, "The Secret of Life: Niels Bohr's Influence on the Biology Program of Max Delbruck," Riv. Stor. Sci., 2 (1985), 487-510; idem, "Molecular Biology and Pauling's Immunochemistry: A Neglected Dimension," Hist. Phil. Life Sci., 10 (1988), 51-72; Robert Kohler, "The Management of Science: The Experience of Warren Weaver and the Rockefeller Foundation Programme in Molecular Biology," Minerva, 14 (1976), 279-306; Robert Olby, The Path to the Double Helix (Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1974); idem, "The Sheriff and the Cowboys: Or, Weaver's Support of Astbury and Pauling," Soc. Stud. Sci., 14 (1984), 244-247; Edward J. Yoxen, "Where Does Schrodinger's 'What Is Life?' Belong in the History of Molecular Biology?" Hist. Sci., 17 (1979), 17-52; idem, "Giving Life a New Meaning: The Rise of the Molecular Biology Establishment," Sociol. Sci., 6 (1982), 123-143; idem, "Scepticism about the Centrality of Technology Transfer in the Rockefeller Foundation Programme in Molecular Biology," Soc. Stud. Sci., 14 (1984), 248252.