Lexical activation in bilinguals' speech production is dynamic: How language ambiguous words can affect cross-language activation

Lexical activation in bilinguals' speech production is dynamic: How language ambiguous words can affect cross-language activation
复制标题

DOI:
10.1080/01690965.2010.530411
复制
发表时间:
2011-01-01
期刊:
LANGUAGE AND COGNITIVE PROCESSES
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
van Hell, Janet
van Hell, Janet
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Hermans, Daan;Ormel, E.;van Hell, Janet

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

双语语言产生系统是一个动态系统,可以在不同的语言激活状态下运行吗?三个实验研究了语言产出中的跨语言语音共激活效应对刺激词的敏感程度。L1荷兰语-L2英语双语者决定一个特定的音素是否是图片的L2英语名称的一部分。这个音素要么是图片的英文名称的一部分(/B/或/t/ in bottle),要么是图片的荷兰文名称的一部分(/f/ in fles [bottle],跨语言条件),要么不是图片的英文或荷兰文名称的一部分(/p/,不相关条件)。在实验1中,我们添加了一组填充图片与非同源名称在荷兰语和英语。相比之下,实验2中的填充图片都有荷兰语和英语的同源名称。在实验3中,填充物由同源(25%)和非同源(75%)名称的图片的混合物。跨语言的语音共激活出现敏感的刺激列表的组成:语音共激活效应观察到实验2和3,但在实验1中没有。结果表明,双语语言产生系统是动态的,可以在不同的模式下运行,这取决于刺激列表的组成。我们讨论了双语语言生产领域使用的实验范式的影响,并为目前的双语语言生产模式。
Is the bilingual language production system a dynamic system that can operate in different language activation states? Three experiments investigated to what extent cross-language phonological co-activation effects in language production are sensitive to the composition of the stimulus list. L1 Dutch-L2 English bilinguals decided whether or not a particular phoneme was part of the L2 English name of the picture. The phoneme was either part of the English name of the picture (/b/ or /t/ in bottle), the Dutch name of the picture (/f/ in fles [bottle], the cross-language condition), or was not part of either the English or Dutch names of the picture (/p/, the unrelated condition). In Experiment 1, we added a set of filler pictures with noncognate names in Dutch and English. In contrast, the filler pictures in Experiment 2 all had cognate names in Dutch and English. In Experiment 3 the fillers consisted of a mixture of pictures with cognate (25%) and noncognate (75%) names. Cross-language phonological co-activation appeared sensitive to the composition of the stimulus list: Phonological co-activation effects were observed in Experiments 2 and 3, but not in Experiment 1. The results indicate that the bilingual language production system dynamic and can operate in different modes, depending upon the composition of the stimulus list. We discuss implications for experimental paradigms used in the field of bilingual language production, and for current bilingual language production models.