References and Notes Supporting Online Material Human Tears Contain a Chemosignal
References and Notes Supporting Online Material Human Tears Contain a Chemosignal
复制标题
DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
--
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
G. R. G. B. Webster-G.-R.-G.-B.-Webster-2298068370;E. C. Sharp;Am J Claas;Respir;D. E. Swayne;J. R. Beck;M. L. Perdue;C. W. Beard;C V Hunter;L. S. Tiley;H. M. Sang;J Chen;S. C. Chen;P. Stern;B. B. Scott-B.;C. Lois;S. Tiley;M. Hagen;J. T. Matthews;M. Krystal;J A Van Der Goot;G. Koch;M. C. De Jong;M. van Boven;J L Umbach;H. L. Yen;L. L. Poon-L.;B. R. Cullen;Mbio;F. Thomson;M. Hutchison;S. Gelstein;Y. Yeshurun;L. Rozenkrantz;S. Shushan;Idan Frumin;Y. Roth;N. Sobel
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
G. R. G. B. Webster-G.-R.-G.-B.-Webster-2298068370;E. C. Sharp;Am J Claas;Respir;D. E. Swayne;J. R. Beck;M. L. Perdue;C. W. Beard;C V Hunter;L. S. Tiley;H. M. Sang;J Chen;S. C. Chen;P. Stern;B. B. Scott-B.;C. Lois;S. Tiley;M. Hagen;J. T. Matthews;M. Krystal;J A Van Der Goot;G. Koch;M. C. De Jong;M. van Boven;J L Umbach;H. L. Yen;L. L. Poon-L.;B. R. Cullen;Mbio;F. Thomson;M. Hutchison;S. Gelstein;Y. Yeshurun;L. Rozenkrantz;S. Shushan;Idan Frumin;Y. Roth;N. Sobel
in the two unexposed control birds. This may be indicative of antigen or viral exposure or an abortive infection. These data show that the TG-D5 chickens did not efficiently transmit infection to birds housed with them, but the specific mechanism underlying this effect is not known. Polymerase decoys may disrupt replication by direct binding to poly-merase or indirectly by influencing the level of expression of the recently discovered, putative regulatory small viral RNA molecules (14, 15) (which may also have a role in innate immunity). Although decoy 5 suppressed polymerase activity in cell culture, this did not translate into a quantitative reduction in virus shedding from infected birds (Fig. 2) (nor have we found any effect in ovo or in fibroblast cell culture). Polymerase-RNA interactions may be involved in the virus packaging process, but after passage through TG-D5 chick embryo fibroblasts in cell culture, we have not found any effect on the genome:plaque-forming unit ratio of the virus to support the hypothesis that the decoy induced the formation of defective virus particles. The standard intravenous pathogenicity index of the virus shed from one of the TG-D5 chickens (#4457, dpi = 2) was determined after a single passage in embryo-nated hens' eggs and found to be unaltered, indicating that passage through TG-D5 chickens does not rapidly select for a stable genetic change that reduces the virulence of the shed virus. Our goal was a proof-of-principle demonstration that genetic modification can be used to prevent avian influenza infection in chickens. The TG-D5 birds exhibited a marked absence of onward transmission of infection, even to unprotected (nontransgenic) chickens housed in direct contact with them. This property could have a major impact on susceptibility and propagation of infection at the flock level and supports the concept of genetic modification for controlling AIV infection in poultry. Our strategy offers substantial potential benefits over vaccination. Although conventional AIV vaccines can achieve strain-specific clinical resistance to primary challenge , sterile immunity is not achieved (3). Such vaccination can allow the cryptic circulation of virus in flocks, facilitating antigenic drift and posing a risk to unvaccinated birds and humans that come into contact with them. In contrast, onward transmission and circulation at the flock level are absent in the TG-D5 chickens. The decoy 5 RNA corresponds to an absolutely conserved sequence that is essential for the regulation of viral transcription, replication, and packaging of all subtypes of influenza …