A critical comparison of integral projection and matrix projection models for demographic analysis: Reply
A critical comparison of integral projection and matrix projection models for demographic analysis: Reply
复制标题
用于人口分析的积分投影和矩阵投影模型的关键比较：回复
DOI：
10.1002/ecy.3822
复制
发表时间：
2022
期刊：
影响因子：
4.8
通讯作者：
Fitzpatrick, Sarah W.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Doak, Daniel F.;Waddle, Ellen;Langendorf, Ryan E.;Louthan, Allison M.;Chardon, Nathalie Isabelle;Dibner, Reilly;Shriver, Robert K.;Linares, Cristina;Garcia, Maria Begoña;Fitzpatrick, Sarah W.
我们感谢Ellner等人。(2022;此后E22）对我们最近关于人口建模方法的论文（Doak等人，2021年，此后称为D21）。虽然E22评论的语气可能暗示着其他情况，但他们的大多数评论都强调了我们在D21中同意并提出的观点，正如我们在D21中反复承认的那样，与这些作者和其他人过去对人口模型的建议和批评相似。然而，在某些领域存在分歧或侧重点不同，我们欢迎有此机会就这些问题进行建设性对话。然而，总的来说，E22和D21在关于如何建立人口模型的相当少的实质性问题上提供了不同的建议。这对生态学家和保护管理人员来说是个好消息，他们希望使用这些工具来模拟种群过程，估计目标物种的脆弱性，并提供有效的管理指南。下面，我们概述我们对E22主要观点的看法。
We thank Ellner et al.(2022; henceforth E22) for taking an interest in our recent paper on demographic modeling methods (Doak et al., 2021, henceforth referred to as D21). While the tone of E22’s comment might imply otherwise, most of their comment emphasizes points with which we agree and made ourselves in D21, and, as we repeatedly acknowledged in D21, are similar to past advice and critiques of demographic modeling by these authors and by others. There are, however, some areas of disagreement or differences in emphasis, and we welcome this opportunity to engage in a constructive dialogue on these points. Overall, however, E22 and D21 offer differing advice on fairly few substantial points about how to build demographic models. This is good news for ecologists and conservation managers who wish to use these tools to model population processes, estimate the vulnerability of target species, and provide effective management guidelines. Below, we outline our thoughts on E22’s main points.