Inhibition of smoking-related information in smokers and nonsmokers.
Inhibition of smoking-related information in smokers and nonsmokers.
复制标题
抑制吸烟者和非吸烟者的吸烟相关信息。
DOI：
10.1037//1064-1297.8.2.192
复制
发表时间：
2000
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Truitt,TP
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Zwaan,RA;Truitt,TP
24 名吸烟者和 24 名不吸烟者执行了 MA Gemsbacher、KR Varner 和 ME Faust (1990) 抑制任务的修改版本，包括在计算机屏幕上呈现句子。每个句子后面都有一个与该句子的含义相关或无关的单词。参与者通过按按钮框上的“是”或“否”键来判断该单词是否与句子相关。在实验句子中，测试词与句子最后一个单词的一个含义相关，但这不一定是句子中想要表达的含义。在一半的实验句子中，最后一个单词是与吸烟相关的单词（例如焦油或灰烬）。当最后一个词与吸烟相关时，吸烟者比非吸烟者有相对较长的反应潜伏期和较低的准确度分数，而两组在与吸烟无关的项目上表现相似，这表明吸烟者比非吸烟者比非吸烟者更难以抑制与任务无关、与吸烟相关的信息，但他们并没有普遍无法抑制不相关的信息。（PsycINFO数据库记录（c）2016 APA，保留所有权利）
Twenty-four smokers and 24 nonsmokers performed a modified version of MA Gemsbacher, KR Varner, and ME Faust's (1990) suppression task, involving presentations of sentences on a computer screen. Each sentence was followed by a word that either was or was not related to the meaning of the sentence. Participants judged whether the word was related to the sentence by pressing either a" yes" or" no" key on a button box. In the experimental sentences, the test word was related to one meaning of the final word of the sentence, but this was not necessarily the meaning intended in the sentence. In half of the experimental sentences, the last word was a smoking-related word (eg, tar or ashes). Smokers had relatively longer response latencies and lower accuracy scores than nonsmokers when the final word was smoking related, whereas both groups performed similarly on items unrelated to smoking, suggesting that smokers had more difficulty than nonsmokers inhibiting task-irrelevant, smoking-related information but that they did not have a general inability to inhibit irrelevant information.(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)