Scaling-up or going-viral: comparing self-help housing and community land trust facilitation
Scaling-up or going-viral: comparing self-help housing and community land trust facilitation
复制标题
扩大规模或病毒式传播：比较自助住房和社区土地信托便利化
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2013
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
D. Mullins
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
T. Moore;D. Mullins
本文探讨了两个基于部门的案例研究，在社区主导的住房，已经扎根在过去十年中的社会创新：社区土地信托（CLTs）成立，以确保获得永久负担得起的住房和自助住房组织成立，使空置房屋重新投入使用。这些创新得益于支持的浪潮，因为他们的专业化地方重点和以人为本的住房方法与英格兰的地方主义和社区赋权的政策议程产生了强烈的共鸣。然而，要让这些创新生根发芽，需要的不仅仅是口头上的支持;它们需要在实践和意识形态上得到加强，以确保与专业化和资源更充足的组织形式一起生存所需的资源流和合法性。本文比较了中介组织提供的支持形式，这些中介组织已被用来促进这些社区主导的住房模式的增长和扩散。它描述了CLT部门如何扩大规模，以创建一个在不同空间尺度上运作的正式体制框架，以支持扎根当地的社区团体，并考虑了这对自助住房部门的影响，该部门倾向于关注小规模项目和社区领导的“病毒式”解决方案。虽然中介支助显然很重要，但在提供支助方面存在紧张关系，因为扩大规模的部门可能开始质疑地方独立性，削弱社区精神，而病毒式解决办法可能面临挑战，难以获得技术技能和资源，同时又不至于负担过重或偏离最初的目标。该文件的结论是，虽然与作为中间人的技术专家建立伙伴关系可能对传播和扩大CLT和自助住房至关重要，但在以保持社区主导的住房的地方规模、问责制和独特附加值的方式获得技术技能和资源方面存在紧张关系。
This paper explores two sector-based case studies of social innovation in community-led housing that have taken root in the last ten years: community land trusts (CLTs) set up to ensure access to affordable homes in perpetuity and self-help housing organisations set up to bring empty homes back into use. These innovations benefit from a groundswell of support, as their specialised local focus and people-centre approach to housing has strong resonance with policy agendas of localism and community empowerment in England. Yet to take root such innovations need more than rhetorical support; they require practical and ideological strengthening to secure flows of resources and legitimacy required for survival alongside professionalised and better resourced forms of organisation. This paper compares the forms of support provided by intermediary organisations that have been used to facilitate the growth and diffusion of these community-led housing models. It describes how the CLT sector has scaled up to create a formal institutional framework operating at different spatial scales to support locally-rooted community groups and considers the implications of this for the self-help housing sector, which has shown a preference for ‘viral’ solutions that focus on small-scale projects and community leadership. While intermediary support is clearly of importance, there are tensions in its provision, as sectors that scale up may begin to question local independence and dilute community ethos, while viral solutions may face challenges in accessing technical skills and resources without becoming overburdened or diverted from initial objectives. The paper concludes that while partnerships with technical experts that act as intermediaries may be crucial for the diffusion and expansion of CLTs and self-help housing, there are tensions in accessing technical skills and resources in a manner that maintains the local scale, accountability and unique added value of community-led housing.
新的政策空间：权力下放对英国第三部门政策的影响
影响因子：
3.2
作者：
Alcock P
通讯作者：
Alcock P